Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sameness and Change

Bibliographic Data

ID10697709
AuthorsV C Chappell, Vere Chappell (corresponding author)
Year1960
Volume69
Issue3
Pages351
Publication date1960-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2183550
OpenAlexW2320924722
LanguageEN
Citations received1

CAN something change and yet remain the same thing? Many philosophers have denied that it can. Change and self-identity, they have held, are incompatible. Some have concluded, on the supposition that self-identity is a necessary condition of a thing, that things do not change-things, that is, in the true and proper sense of the word, real things. Parmenides and Plato are ancient philosophers who drew this conclusion, and it has been drawn in recent times by Whitehead. Other philosophers who have held that change and self-identity are incompatible have adopted the contrary supposition about things: it is change and not sameness which is essential to them. These philosophers have then concluded that things, at least real things, are not self-identical from moment to moment. Heraclitus, apparently, was expressing this conclusion when he made his famous statement about stepping into rivers. And Bergson, more recently, has made a similar point in a variety of ways. Still other philosophers, finally, have held sameness and change to be incompatible without supposing either to be a necessary feature of things in the full or true sense. Thus Hume, for example, argued that the attribution of identity to things whose existence is not invariable and uninterrupted is a mistake, albeit a mistake that all of us constantly make, but he seems not to have held that things of this sort are any less things, or exist in any less significant sense, than those whose existence is invariable and uninterrupted. Against the view that change and sameness are incompatible, however, we have the testimony of Descartes. In the second Meditation Descartes tells of taking a piece of wax fresh from the hive and bringing it near a fire. The wax changed, in some respects radically. Yet, asks Descartes, not the same wax remain (after this change)? It must be granted that it does remain; no one denies it, no one supposes otherwise. Descartes at least thought that things can change and yet remain the same things. He also claimed that everyone thinks this. If we except

Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · General interest · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History

  • L'identité est-elle relative

    Open Access•Maryvonne Longeart-Roth•Dialogue•1981

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,02
Citation span1981 - 1981 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae