Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID10698639
AuthorsDavid Christensen (0000-0001-5255-0029)
Year1994
Volume103
Issue2
Pages345
Publication date1994-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeREVIEW
Review ofBayes or bust?: A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory, John Earman, 1992
VenueThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2185741
OpenAlexW2141027875
LanguageEN

Bayes' Bayesianism the machinery of modern Bayesianism success stories challenges met the problem of old evidence the rationality and objectivity of scientific inference a plea for eliminative induction normal science, scientific revolutions, and all that - Thomas Bayes versus Thomas Kuhn Bayesianism versus formal-learning theory a dialogue

Bayes' theorem · Bayesian probability · Boom · Bust · Econometrics · Economics · Epistemology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Engineering · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Risk, Precaution, and Emerging Technologies

    Fritz Allhoff•Studies in Ethics Law and…•2009

  • The Paradox of Confirmation1

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Philosophy Compass•2006

  • Teaching & Learning Guide for

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Philosophy Compass•2008

  • Is the mind Bayesian? The case for agnosticism

    Open Access•Jean Baratgin, Guy Politzer•Mind & Society•2006

  • Not Enough There There Evidence, Reasons, and Language Independence

    Open Access•Michael G Titelbaum•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • Confirmation and explaining how possible

    Open Access•Patrick Forber•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

  • Social Research and ‘Race’ Policy Framing in Britain and France

    Open Access•E Bleich•The British Journal of Politics…•2011

  • The nature of juridical proof

    Open Access•Richard J Allen•The International Journal of…•2016

  • Uncomfortable bedfellows

    Open Access•Armond Duwell•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011

  • Choosing between two conflicting scientific hypotheses

    Open Access•Camilo J Cela‐conde, C J Cela-Conde•Human Evolution•1999

  • Building Communities, Bridging Gaps

    Open Access•Andrew Bennett•Political Psychology•2008

  • Statistical Inference for Apparent Populations

    Richard A Berk, B Western et al.•Sociological Methodology•1995

  • Reliable Knowledge and Unreliable Stuff

    Edward W Constant•Technology and Culture•1999

  • Swinburne's argument for the existence of God

    Open Access•JULIA BRAUNSTEINER-BERGER•Religious Studies•2014

  • How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction

    Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage•Psychological Review•1995

  • The Necessity of Being Comparative

    Open Access•Kevin A Clarke•Comparative Political Studies•2007

  • Bayesian Merging of Opinions and Algorithmic Randomness

    Francesca Zaffora Blando•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test

    Richard L Hagen•American Psychologist•1997

  • Carnap, Quine, and Putnam on Methods of Inquiry

    Gary Ebbs•Carnap, Quine, and Putnam on…•2017

  • Socratic Epistemology

    Open Access•Jaakko Hintikka•Socratic Epistemology•2007

  • Can Modal Skepticism Defeat Humean Skepticism?

    Open Access•Peter Hawke•Modal Epistemology after…•2017

  • Race Politics in Britain and France

    Open Access•E Bleich•Race Politics in Britain and France•2003

  • The mother of all isms

    Open Access•Andrew Bennett•European Journal of International…•2013

  • Invariance, Symmetry And Rationality

    Open Access•Michael Kruse•Synthese•2000

  • Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction

    Deborah G Mayo, Aris Spanos•The British Journal for the…•2006

  • Learning to Coordinate; a Recursion Theoretic Perspective

    Open Access•Franco Montagna, Daniel N Osherson et al.•Synthese•1999

  • The Scope, Limits, and Distinctiveness of the Method of 'Deduction from the Phenomena

    John L Worrall, J Worrall•The British Journal for the…•2000

  • Confirmation, Explanation, and Logical Strength

    David E Nelson•The British Journal for the…•1996

  • De Finetti, Countable Additivity, Consistency and Coherence

    Colin Howson•The British Journal for the…•2008

  • Theories of Probability

    Colin Howson•The British Journal for the…•1995

  • In Defense of Reverse Inference

    Edouard Machery•The British Journal for the…•2014

  • Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning

    Franz Huber•The British Journal for the…•2005

  • Hempel's Raven Paradox

    Peter B M Vranas•The British Journal for the…•2004

  • A Paradigm-Based Solution to the Riddle of Induction

    Open Access•Mark A Changizi, Timothy P Barber•Synthese•1998

  • Deterministic Convergence and Strong Regularity

    Open Access•Michael Nielsen•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • Bayes not Bust! Why Simplicity is no Problem for Bayesians

    David L Dowe, Steve Gardner et al.•The British Journal for the…•2007

  • The Rational Analysis Of Mind And Behavior

    Open Access•Nick Chater, Mike Oaksford•Synthese•2000

  • Truth in Evidence and Truth in Arguments without Logical Omniscience

    Gregor Betz•The British Journal for the…•2016

  • Curve-Fitting for Bayesians

    Gordon Belot•The British Journal for the…•2017

  • The Quantitative Problem of Old Evidence

    Eric Christian Barnes•The British Journal for the…•1999

  • Genuine Confirmation and Tacking by Conjunction

    Open Access•Michael Schippers, Gerhard Schurz•The British Journal for the…•2020

  • The logic of success

    Kevin T Kelly, K Kelly•The British Journal for the…•2000

  • Bayesian Confirmation

    Peter Brössel, Franz Huber•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • Variation and the Accuracy of Predictions

    Michael Kruse•The British Journal for the…•1997

  • The feasibility and malleability of EBM

    Open Access•Jon Williamson•THEORIA An International Journal…•2020

  • The Rehabilitation of Deductive Reasoning

    Open Access•Thomas Bartelborth•THEORIA An International Journal…•2020

  • Conjectures and Disconfirmations

    Open Access•Martin King•Erkenntnis•2023

  • You say you want a revolution

    Open Access•Alexander Meehan•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Real and ideal rationality

    Open Access•Robert Weston Siscoe•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • Fragmentation and logical omniscience

    Open Access•Adam Elga, Agustín Rayo•Noûs•2022

  • Distinguished Lecture in Archeology

    Open Access•George L Cowgill•American Anthropologist•1993

  • Truth-Seeking by Abduction

    Open Access•Ilkka Niiniluoto•Truth-Seeking by Abduction•2018

  • Modelling Epistemic Systems

    Open Access•André C R Martins•Theories and Simulations of…•2014

  • Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle

    Open Access•Daniel Steel•Philosophy and the Precautionary…•2014

  • Estimating Impact

    Open Access•Alexander Kott, Gary Citrenbaum•Estimating Impact•2010

  • Rationalities in History

    Open Access•D L D'Avray, D L D’avray•Rationalities in History•2010

  • The Possibility Principle

    Open Access•James Mahoney, Gary Goertz•American Political Science Review•2004

  • A Set-Theoretic Approach to Bayesian Process Tracing

    Open Access•Rodrigo Barrenechea, James Mahoney•Sociological Methods & Research•2019

  • The kinematics of belief and desire

    Open Access•Richard Bradley•Synthese•2007

  • The logic of empirical theories revisited

    Open Access•Johan Van Benthem•Synthese•2012

  • Bayesian Confirmation Theory and The Likelihood Principle

    Open Access•David Steel, Daniel Steel•Synthese•2007

  • The logic of coherence

    Open Access•Michael Schippers, Mark Siebel•Synthese•2021

  • Confirmation and the generalized Nagel–Schaffner model of reduction

    Open Access•Marko Tešić•Synthese•2019

  • Justifying inference to the best explanation as a practical meta-syllogism on dialectical structures

    Open Access•Gregor Betz•Synthese•2013

  • New theory about old evidence

    Open Access•Sylvia Wenmacker, Jan-Willem Romeijn•Synthese•2016

  • Irrelevant conjunction and the ratio measure or historical skepticism

    Open Access•J Brian Pitts•Synthese•2013

  • Logic with numbers

    Open Access•Colin Howson•Synthese•2007

  • On the significance of conditional probabilities

    Open Access•Jordan Howard Sobel•Synthese•1996

  • Finite additivity, another lottery paradox and conditionalisation

    Open Access•Colin Howson•Synthese•2014

  • The variety-of-evidence thesis

    Open Access•François Claveau, Olivier Grenier•Synthese•2019

  • Reconsidering the miracle argument on the supposition of transient underdetermination

    Open Access•P Hoyningen-Huene•Synthese•2011

  • Linguistics and the explanatory economy

    Open Access•G Dupre•Synthese•2021

  • A pluralistic account of epistemic rationality

    Open Access•Matthew Kopec•Synthese•2018

  • Unconceived alternatives and the cathedral problem

    Open Access•Samuel Ruhmkorff•Synthese•2019

  • Logical ignorance and logical learning

    Open Access•Richard Pettigrew•Synthese•2021

  • Assessing theories, Bayes style

    Open Access•Franz Huber•Synthese•2008

  • Measuring the overall incoherence of credence functions

    Open Access•Julia Staffel•Synthese•2015

  • Bayesian representation of a prolonged archaeological debate

    Open Access•Efraim Wallach•Synthese•2018

  • Simultaneous belief updates via successive Jeffrey conditionalization

    Open Access•Ilho Park•Synthese•2013

  • Tracking probabilistic truths

    Open Access•Alexandru Baltag, Soroush Rafiee Rad et al.•Synthese•2021

  • On the role of explanatory and systematic power in scientific reasoning

    Open Access•Peter Brössel•Synthese•2015

  • The new Tweety puzzle

    Open Access•Matthias Unterhuber, Gerhard Schurz•Synthese•2013

  • Evidentialism and belief polarization

    Open Access•Emily C Mcwilliams•Synthese•2021

  • A Bayesian explanation of the irrationality of sexist and racist beliefs involving generic content

    Open Access•Paul Silva Jr, Paul Silva•Synthese•2020

  • Model change and reliability in scientific inference

    Open Access•Erich Kummerfeld, David Danks•Synthese•2014

  • An impossibility theorem for amalgamating evidence

    Open Access•Jacob Stegenga•Synthese•2013

  • Epistemic values and the value of learning

    Open Access•Wayne C Myrvold•Synthese•2012

  • Conditional Degree of Belief and Bayesian Inference

    Open Access•Jan Sprenger•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • Error Probabilities in Error

    Open Access•Colin Howson•Philosophy of Science•1997

  • The Dark Matter Double Bind

    Open Access•William L Vanderburgh•Philosophy of Science•2003

  • Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence

    Open Access•Wayne C Myrvold•Philosophy of Science•1996

  • The Problem of Measure Sensitivity Redux

    Open Access•Peter Brössel•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • Bayesianism and the Value of Diverse Evidence

    Open Access•David Steel, Daniel Steel•Philosophy of Science•1996

  • Use-Novelty, Severity, and a Systematic Neglect of Relevant Alternatives

    Open Access•Tetsuji Iseda•Philosophy of Science•1999

  • Some Difficulties for the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives

    Open Access•Samuel Ruhmkorff•Philosophy of Science•2011

  • A Logic of Induction

    Open Access•Colin Howson•Philosophy of Science•1997

  • Radical Probabilism and Bayesian Conditioning

    Open Access•Richard Bradley•Philosophy of Science•2005

  • Big Data Biology

    Open Access•Emanuele Ratti•Philosophy of Science•2015

  • Beyond Bayesianism

    Open Access•Michael Kruse•Philosophy of Science•1999

  • The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson•Philosophy of Science•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae