Truth, Content, and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10705752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas R Grimes (Arkansas State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 514-522 |
| Publication date | 1990-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1086/289571 |
| OpenAlex | W2090802342 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 6 |
After presenting the major objections raised against standard formulations of the H-D method of theory testing, I identify what seems to be an important element of truth underlying the method. I then draw upon this element in an effort to develop a plausible formulation of the H-D method which avoids the various objections
Calculus (dental) · Content (measure theory) · Element (criminal law) · Epistemology · Mathematical analysis · Computer Science · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
Revisiting Inductive Confirmation in Science
Relevance as difference-making
The voice of women on power(lessness) in Türkiye
Formal schemas of induction as models
Discoverers' Induction
Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories
Solving the Tacking Problem with Contrast Classes
Are Empirical Evidence Claims A Priori
Modernizing Political Science
Hypothetico-Deductive Confirmation
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,3 |
| Citation span | 1993 - 2025 (33) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |