Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

This ground truth is muddy anyway”

Ground Truth Data Assemblages for Medical AI Development

Bibliographic Data

ID10756752
AuthorsCharlotte Högberg (0000-0002-1462-6325, Lund University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume62
Issue1-2
Pages85-106
Publication date2025-06-12
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologisk Forskning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0342 • E-ISSN: 2002-066X
PublisherSociologisk Forskning, Swedish Sociological Association (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.37062/sf.62.27826
OpenAlexW4411243923
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited11

This article explores assemblages of ground truth datasets for the development of medical artificial intelligence (AI). By drawing from interviews and observations, I examine how AI experts developing medical AI relate to the referential truth basis of their work, their ground truths, as an epistemic concern. By addressing how datasets are assembled from different sources, and produced, augmented and synthesised, this study shows how ground truths are valued based on humanness, quality of medical expert judgements, temporality and technical qualities. Moreover, this article analyses truth practices as productive moments in AI development, the role of human expertise and the perceived strengths and limits of expert-based annotations. The valuations of ground truths shatter the image of medical classifications, and AI models, as stable neutral entities. Moreover, this article shows how valuations of ground truths encompass more than alignment with standardised expertise. To better understand the possibilities for medical AI to live up to ideals of accuracy, fairness, trustworthiness and transparency, we need moreknowledge on assumptions, negotiations and epistemic concerns upon which medical AI is built

Common ground · Epistemology · Ground truth · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Communication · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Philosophy · Race, Genetics, and Society

  • Zones of (un)certainty

    Open Access•Dieuwertje Luitse, Tobias Blanke•AI & Society•2026

  • Digital phantoms in medical research

    Open Access•Charlotte Högberg, Patricia Winter•Big Data & Society•2026

  • Building truths in AI

    Anne Henriksen, Anja Bechmann•Information Communication & Society•2020

  • The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production

    Open Access•Michael Meuser, Ulrike Nagel•Interviewing Experts•2009

  • Groundwork for AI

    Open Access•Florian Jaton•Social Studies of Science•2023

  • We get the algorithms of our ground truths

    Open Access•Florian Jaton•Social Studies of Science•2017

  • The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts

    Open Access•Trevor Pinch, Trevor J Pinch et al.•Social Studies of Science•1984

  • Standardization in Action

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Marc Berg•Social Studies of Science•1997

  • The ethics and politics of data sets in the age of machine learning

    Open Access•Nanna Bonde Thylstrup•Media Culture & Society•2022

  • Thinking critically about and researching algorithms

    Rob Kitchin•Information Communication & Society•2016

  • The Truthiness about Hurricane Catastrophe Models

    Open Access•Jessica Weinkle, Roger Pielke et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • How should we theorize algorithms? Five ideal types in analyzing algorithmic normativities

    Open Access•Francis Lee, L B Larsen•Big Data & Society•2019

  • Algorithms as culture

    Open Access•N Seaver•Big Data & Society•2017

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae