Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Travel to allies or adversaries? A compositional analysis of U.S. diplomatic visits

Bibliographic Data

ID10764704
AuthorsJonghoon Lee (0000-0002-7059-3126, Department of Political Science Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA), James D Kim (0000-0002-1412-1132, Security Studies Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USA, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume105
Issue4
Pages996-1013
Publication date2024-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-4941 • E-ISSN: 1540-6237
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ssqu.13348
OpenAlexW4392131675
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited40

Objective When and why do U.S. leaders visit their allies or adversaries? Much of the literature on diplomatic visits treats each visit as an independent observation. In this article, we analyze high‐level diplomatic visits as compositional data based on the assumption that they are scarce political resources. Methods We conduct a compositional analysis of U.S. high‐level officials' diplomatic visits between 1950 and 2010. Results We find that U.S. diplomatic visits to its allies are defense‐oriented, so leaders spend more time touring them during their security crises to signal reassurance. Additionally, we find that visits to adversaries are motivated by leaders' domestic political concerns, particularly their high public unpopularity. Visiting a hostile country is a challenging and salient foreign policy task, providing a high‐profile opportunity to improve their domestic image and standing. This effect is particularly significant in a divided government, where leaders turn to foreign policy to maximize domestic political impacts amid domestic gridlock. Conclusion The findings suggest that U.S. leaders travel to allies and adversaries for distinct strategic purposes. Furthermore, our study suggests that future research on diplomatic visits should use a compositional variable approach to better model the dynamics and competitive nature of travel diplomacy

Demographic economics · Economics · Political science · European Union Policy and Governance · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy

  • Does Public Diplomacy Sway Domestic Public Opinion? Presidential Travel Abroad and Approval at Home

    Open Access•Benjamin E Goldsmith, Yusaku Horiuchi et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2026

  • High-Level Leader Visits

    Open Access•Ali Balci, James D Kim et al.•International Studies Perspectives•2025

  • US Diplomatic Visits and Allies’ Military Spending

    Open Access•James D Kim•Foreign Policy Analysis•2024

  • Diplomatic Visits and Image-Building

    Ho-Hsien Pan, Hsin-Hsin Pan et al.•Asian Survey•2026

  • A Forgotten Tie Between Democracies and Nondemocracies in Asymmetric Cooperation

    Open Access•Yasuki Kudo•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Where Small Powers Travel? Understanding Jordan’s High-Level Diplomatic Visit Patterns

    Open Access•Ali Balci•Political Studies Review•2025

  • Giving a hand to autocrats

    Open Access•Ali Balci, Bülent Aras•Journal of Peace Research•2025

  • The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data

    Open Access•J Aitchison•The Statistical Analysis of…•1986

  • Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy, Revised Edition

    Ole R Holsti, Ole Holsti•Public opinion and American…•2004

  • State Visits and International Trade

    Open Access•Volker Nitsch•World Economy•2007

  • Clarify

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Jason Wittenberg et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2003

  • Visiting the hegemon

    Open Access•Faradj Koliev, Magnus Lundgren•Research & Politics•2021

  • Reassessing the fulfillment of alliance commitments in war

    Open Access•Molly Berkemeier, Matthew Fuhrmann•Research & Politics•2018

  • Peace data

    Open Access•Paul F Diehl, Gary Goertz et al.•Conflict Management and Peace…•2019

  • Going Global

    Amnon Cavari, Micah Ables•Congress & the Presidency•2019

  • Presidential hawkishness, domestic popularity, and diplomatic normalization

    Open Access•James D Kim•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Presidential Travel and the Rose Garden Strategy

    Open Access•Sarah Margaret Grace Thomson•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Security First

    Open Access•James H Lebovic•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944

    Brett Ashley Leeds, Brett Leeds et al.•International Interactions•2002

  • High-level visit and national security policy

    Austin Horng-En Wang, Charles K S Wu et al.•International Interactions•2023

  • Crossing the Water's Edge

    Tim Groeling, Matthew A Baum•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Dynamic Pie

    Open Access•Andrew Q Philips, Amanda Rutherford et al.•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Making It Personal

    Roseanne W Mcmanus•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Follow the Leader? Presidential Approval, Presidential Support, and Representatives' Electoral Fortunes

    Paul Gronke, Jeffrey W Koch et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Making Sense of Isolationism

    Joshua D Kertzer•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Presidential Approval and Legislative Success

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Scott De Marchi•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Presidents Abroad

    Open Access•Ian Ostrander, Toby J Rider•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • Iraq the Vote

    Open Access•Christopher Gelpi, Jason Reifler et al.•Political Behavior•2007

  • An Easy and Accurate Regression Model for Multiparty Electoral Data

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Joshua A Tucker et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • An Analysis of the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Dataset, 1816–2001

    Douglas M Gibler, Steven V Miller et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2016

  • The Diplomatic Core

    James H Lebovic, Elizabeth N Saunders•International Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Electoral Margins and American Foreign Policy1

    Open Access•Philip B K Potter•International Studies Quarterly•2013

  • The Pretty Prudent Public

    Bruce W Jentleson•International Studies Quarterly•1992

  • The Politics of Risking Peace

    Kenneth A Schultz•International Organization•2005

  • Chinese Power and the State-Owned Enterprise

    Open Access•Randall W Stone, Yu Wang et al.•International Organization•2022

  • Foreign Policy and the Electoral Connection

    John H Aldrich, Christopher Gelpi et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • State Visits and Leader Survival

    Open Access•Matt Malis, Alastair Smith•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • When Doves Cry

    Open Access•Michael Colaresi•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations

    Michael Tomz•International Organization•2007

  • Essays in the Public Philosophy

    Vincent C Hopkins, Vincent Hopkins•Thought•1956

  • The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting

    Open Access•B Dan Wood, Jeffrey S Peake•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Does Public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits

    Open Access•Benjamin E Goldsmith, Yusaku Horiuchi et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, John L Sullivan et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War

    Open Access•Alexandre Debs, H E Goemans•American Political Science Review•2010

  • A Statistical Model for Multiparty Electoral Data

    Open Access•Jonathan Ned Katz, Gary King•American Political Science Review•1999

Citations per year3.5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae