Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

A Tangled Web of Expectations

Bibliographic Data

ID10792114
AuthorsRichard A Epstein (0000-0001-6624-7311, University of Chicago, corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume45
Issue5
Pages1369
Publication date1993-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueStanford Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-9765 • E-ISSN: 1939-8581
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1229072
OpenAlexW628888805
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Although anticipated before its arrival, last term's decision in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council ' has been rightly regarded as anticlimactic. To be sure, the decision represents something of a high water mark in takings jurisprudence, for a six justice majority of the Court2 allowed that some restrictions on land use might in principle be caught by the Takings Clause. But what the Court gave with one hand, it took away with the other. Justice Scalia held that the Takings Clause reached only those land use restrictions that deprived the owner of all economically beneficial uses of property.3 The proper status of permanent but partial restrictions on land use was not explicitly addressed, but these may now be regarded as legitimate and noncompensable exercises under the state police power. Yet even with total regulatory takings, Justice Scalia stopped short of embracing Lucas's theory that the total loss of beneficial use constitutes a per se compensable taking. Rather, he held that even for total regulatory takings a second test had to be passed as well: If the regulated activity constitutes some form of noxious use or nuisance-like activity subject to regulation at common law, then the state need not compensate the landowner for any resulting economic loss.4 Scalia's constitutional edifice thus rests on two critical distinctions. The first is whether the restriction on use is partial or total. If partial, then the constitutional inquiry is at its end, and the restriction is sustained. If total, then

Geography · Political science · South carolina · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine · Public Administration

  • A Liberal Theory of Property

    Open Access•Hanoch Dagan•Liberal Theory of Property•2021

  • Classical Liberal Property and the Question of Institutional Choice

    Open Access•Thomas W Merrill•The Journal of Legal Studies•2021

  • The Mystery of Property Rights

    Open Access•Naomi R Lamoreaux•The Journal of Economic History•2011

  • Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and ‘Regulatory Taking’ in International Law

    Open Access•Thomas Waelde, Thomas W Waelde et al.•International and Comparative Law…•2001

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0.16
Citation span2001 - 2021 (21)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae