Classical Liberal Property and the Question of Institutional Choice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21410514 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas W Merrill (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | S2 |
| Pages | S9-S25 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Legal Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2530 • E-ISSN: 1537-5366 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/704894 |
| OpenAlex | W3213318774 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
Richard Epstein’s property scholarship tracks his classical liberal theory of government. The classical liberal would permit state intervention to overcome collective-action problems but not to engage in redistribution of wealth. With respect to private law, Epstein harbors no clear preference for either the legislature or the courts as a source of limits on owners’ autonomy to overcome collective-action problems. With regard to public law, in contrast, Epstein would elevate the courts to a superior status relative to legislatures and would have courts enforce the classical liberal ideal as a matter of constitutional law. This article questions whether giving such power to courts makes sense, even on classical liberal assumptions
Autonomy · Classical liberalism · Collective action · Constitutional law · Economics · Ideal (ethics) · Law and economics · Legislature · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Legal principles and applications · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |