Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scylla and Charybdis of the epistemic relativist

Why the epistemic relativist still cannot use the sceptic’s strategy

Bibliographic Data

ID10798370
AuthorsMarkus Seidel
Year2013
Volume44
Issue1
Pages145-149
Publication date2013-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueStudies in History and Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-3681 • E-ISSN: 1879-2510
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.10.004
OpenAlexW2014383362
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited5

Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Relativism · Skepticism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism

    Open Access•Michael Kusch, Martin Kusch•Synthese•2017

  • Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science

    Open Access•M Seidel•Synthese•2021

  • Why the epistemic relativist cannot use the sceptic’s strategy. A comment on Sankey

    Open Access•M Seidel•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2012

  • How the epistemic relativist may use the sceptic’s strategy

    Open Access•Howard Sankey•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2012

  • Scepticism, relativism and the argument from the criterion

    Open Access•Howard Sankey•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2012

  • Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion

    Open Access•Howard Sankey•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2011

Citations per year0.22
Citation span2017 - 2021 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae