Why the epistemic relativist cannot use the sceptic’s strategy. A comment on Sankey
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11602718 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Seidel (0000-0003-3550-6151, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 134-139 |
| Publication date | 2012-08-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-3681 • E-ISSN: 1879-2510 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.06.004 |
| OpenAlex | W2015369942 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 8 |
Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Naturalism · Philosophy of science · Relativism · Skepticism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
How the epistemic relativist may use the sceptic’s strategy
Evidence, justification, and epistemic standards
More than just principles
Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism
Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science
On relativism and pluralism
Scepticism, relativism, and the structure of epistemic frameworks
Scylla and Charybdis of the epistemic relativist
| Citations per year | 0.57 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |