The nature and difficulty of physical efforts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10808395 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Olivier Massin (0000-0002-3949-4429, University of Neuchâtel, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 203 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-024-04572-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4397008749 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
We make physical efforts when we swim, carry shopping bags, push heavy doors, or cycle up hills. A growing concern among philosophers and scientists in related fields is the absence of a well-defined concept for physical efforts. This paper addresses this issue by presenting a force-based definition of physical efforts. In Sect. 1, we explore the shortcomings of existing definitions of effort. Section 2 introduces the force-based account of efforts according to which making an effort consists in exerting a force so as to make an object move or stay at rest. Section 3 introduces three central distinctions stemming from the account: failed vs. successful efforts; resisted vs. unresisted efforts; and efforts vs. effortful actions. Section 4 presents a key objection, to the effect that the force-based theory cannot account for the difficulty of efforts: efforts usually feel difficult, but effort’s difficulty is not always a function of the magnitude of force(s) exerted. Section 5 argues that the most in-depth account of difficulty so far, that developed by Bradford (2015), cannot account for the difficulty of efforts. Sections 6 & 7 develop a novel account of effort’s difficulty
Epistemology · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of science · Action Observation and Synchronization · Computer Science · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Philosophy · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |