Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Feminist logic, broadly speaking

Bibliographic Data

ID10809970
AuthorsFranci Mangraviti (0000-0003-1537-0883, University of Padua, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume206
Issue2
Publication date2025-07-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSynthese (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11229-025-05176-3
OpenAlexW4412901027
LanguageEN
References cited35

I argue that the continued focus on the possibility question - whether feminist logic can exist as a respectable practice - has several harmful consequences. First, it invites the association of feminist logic with substantial positions in the philosophy of logic, which unnecessarily leaves room for dismissing the field a priori. Second, it invites a systematic reading of feminist logicians as arguing in isolation from their logical practice, which can hide some genuine possibilities for the field. To avoid these issues, I propose a very broad characterization of feminist logic as a kind of practice which addresses some harmful aspect of dominant practices by focusing on their interaction with logical practices. This characterization trivializes the possibility question, enforces no particular conception of logic to the exclusion of others, yet leaves room for both conservative and radical approaches

Epistemology · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of science · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications

  • Relevant Logic

    Open Access•Edwin Mares, Edwin D Mares•Relevant Logic•2004

  • Thinking to Some Purpose

    L Susan Stebbing, Susan Stebbing•Thinking to Some Purpose•2022

  • Anti-exceptionalism about logic

    Open Access•Ole Thomassen Hjortland•Philosophical Studies•2017

  • How Is This Paper Philosophy?

    Kristie Dotson, Ali Hakim Salih•تبين للدراسات الفكرية و الثقافية•2026

  • The validity of disjunctive syllogism is not so easily proved.

    Chris Mortensen•Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic•1983

  • The Contribution of Logic to Epistemic Injustice

    Franci Mangraviti•Social Epistemology•2024

  • Critical Math Kinds

    Open Access•Franci Mangraviti•Erkenntnis•2025

  • (What) Is Feminist Logic? (What) Do We Want It to Be

    Catharine Saint-Croix, Roy T Cook•History and Philosophy of Logic•2024

  • Logic and Discrimination

    Elena Ficara•History and Philosophy of Logic•2024

  • Feminism and the Mastery of Nature

    Val Plumwood•Ideals and Ideologies•2019

  • From Anti-Exceptionalism to Feminist Logic

    Open Access•Gillian Russell•Hypatia•2024

  • Can There Be A Feminist Science

    Open Access•Helen E Longino•Hypatia•1987

  • Anti-exceptionalism about logic as tradition rejection

    Open Access•Ben Martin, Ole Thomassen Hjortland•Synthese•2022

  • Limits of Abductivism About Logic

    Open Access•Ulf Hlobil•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2020

  • Power in the service of love

    Open Access•Carroll Guen Hart•Hypatia•1993

  • An Alleged Tension Between non-Classical Logics and Applied Classical Mathematics

    Open Access•Sebastian Horvat, Iulian D Toader•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Relevant Logic and the Philosophy of Mathematics

    Open Access•Edwin Mares•Philosophy Compass•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae