A plea for radical contextualism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10814913 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Minyao Huang (University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 194 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 963-988 |
| Publication date | 2017-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Synthese (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-7857 • E-ISSN: 1573-0964 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-015-0982-z |
| OpenAlex | W2302686169 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 35 |
Extant contextualist theories have relied on the mechanism of pragmatically driven modulation to explain the way non-indexical expressions take on different interpretations in different contexts. In this paper I argue that a modulation-based contextualist semantics is untenable with respect to non-ambiguous expressions whose invariant meaning fails to determine a unique literal interpretation, such as ‘lawyer’ ‘musician’ ‘book’ and ‘game’. The invariant meaning of such an expression corresponds to a range of closely related and equally basic interpretations, none of which can be distinguished as the literal interpretation. Moreover, what counts as a literal interpretation as opposed to a non-literal one is arguably vague. The nonuniqueness of the literal interpretation and the vagueness in the literal/non-literal divide doubly challenge a modulation-based semantics, for modulation is supposed to operate on a unique literal interpretation to generate a clearly non-literal interpretation. Lastly I contend that non-ambiguous expressions which lack determinate literal interpretation are amenable to a Radical Contextualist semantics, according to which the invariant meaning of such an expression directs its interpretation to congruent background information in context. Thereby, these expressions exhibit semantically driven context sensitivity without displaying indexicality
Context (archaeology) · Contextualism · Epistemology · Indexicality · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literal (mathematical logic) · Literal and figurative language · Meaning (existential) · Metaphysics · Philosophy of language · Vagueness · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Minimal Semantics
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics
Beyond Rigidity
Thoughts and Utterances
Metaphors We Live By
The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions
Conversational Impliciture
Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste
On the Representation of Context
The Pragmatics of What is Said
Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste
On Quantifier Domain Restriction
Context and Logical Form
The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions
Contextualism
The Inessential Indexical
Word meaning and concept expressed
The Myth of the De Se
Making a Pronoun
First-person reference in discourse
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |