Physiological Responses to Different Modes of Feedback in Pronunciation Training
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10817670 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard R Lee, Linetta McCune, Layne Patton |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 117 |
| Publication date | 1970-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | TESOL Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0039-8322 • E-ISSN: 1545-7249 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3586181 |
| OpenAlex | W1976035085 |
| Language | EN |
Physiological measures of anatomical arousal can offer insight into the learning process independently of pre-post test measures. Some arousal is necessary for learning. Students seem to routinize pattern drills; the question is: what causes the phenomenon, the drill format or the presence or absence of a human interlocutor? Different feedback conditions were rotated to test the effect on arousal of different feedback styles, and the presence of a human interlocutor. Drill format, whether presented by tape or an instructor, resulted in uniformly depressed levels of arousal. Free conversation produces arousal and, one assumes, learning of a different order of magnitude. Implications are drawn for the instruction of intermediate and advanced students
Cognitive psychology · Geography · Linguistics · Pronunciation · Training (meteorology) · Communication · Communication in Education and Healthcare · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|