Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Interplay of Task Characteristics, Linguistic Complexity, and Language Proficiency in High‐Stakes English as a Foreign Language Writing

Bibliographic Data

ID10818367
AuthorsAnja Riemenschneider (0000-0002-4748-1660, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Institute for Educational Quality Improvement (IQB) Berlin Germany, corresponding author), Zarah Weiss (University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany), Pauline Schröter (Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, Institute for Educational Quality Improvement (IQB) Berlin Germany), Detmar Meurers (0000-0002-9740-7442, University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany)
Year2024
Volume58
Issue2
Pages775-801
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTESOL Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0039-8322 • E-ISSN: 1545-7249
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/tesq.3254
OpenAlexW4385719415
LanguageEN
References cited42

The linguistic characteristics of text productions depend on various factors, including individual language proficiency as well as the tasks used to elicit the production. To date, little attention has been paid to whether some writing tasks are more suitable than others to represent and differentiate students' proficiency levels. This issue is especially relevant in the context of high‐stakes language examinations. In this study, we investigated task effects in English as a foreign language (EFL) Abitur examinations, the high‐stakes test qualifying for higher education admission in Germany. Based on texts produced by 362 students, we examined (a) if and how student writings differ in their linguistic complexity and (b) if the EFL Abitur tasks are equally suited to differentiate the students' proficiency levels. We used a broad operationalization of linguistic complexity, including measures from various linguistic domains in the computational analysis of the texts. The results of our mixed‐effects models show that student texts differ in their linguistic complexity primarily by the functional needs of the task types employed ( summary , analysis , and argumentation ). Furthermore, writing tasks that demand high independence in language performance are best suited to differentiate between proficiency levels, which becomes especially evident in vocabulary choice and usage

Context (archaeology) · Foreign language · Language assessment · Language proficiency · Linguistic sequence complexity · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Operationalization · Task (project management) · Task Analysis · Test (biology) · Vocabulary · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification

  • Second language development in writing

    Kate Wolfe-Quintero•Second language development in…•1998

  • A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning (Oxford Applied Linguistics)

    Peter Skehan•A Cognitive Approach to Language…•1998

  • Register, Genre, and Style

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad•Register, Genre, and Style•2019

  • Challenging stereotypes about academic writing

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, BETHANY GRAY•Journal of English for Academic…•2010

  • Moving beyond Kučera and Francis

    Open Access•Marc Brysbaert, Boris New•Behavior Research Methods•2009

  • MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D

    Open Access•Philip M McCarthy, Scott Jarvi et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2010

  • Linguistic Features of Writing Quality

    Open Access•D S Mcnamara, Scott A Crossley et al.•Written Communication•2010

  • Linguistic features in writing quality and development

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, Scott Crossley•Journal of Writing Research•2020

  • Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity

    Open Access•Bram Bulté, Alex Housen•Journal of Second Language Writing•2014

  • Controlling the False Discovery Rate

    Open Access•Yoav Benjamini, Yosef Hochberg•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1995

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, D J Davidson et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • Caf

    Gabriele Pallotti•Applied Linguistics•2009

  • Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition

    Alex Housen, Folkert Kuiken•Applied Linguistics•2009

  • Syntactic Complexity Measures and their Relationship to L2 Proficiency

    Lourdes Ortega•Applied Linguistics•2003

  • Towards an Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA

    John M Norris, Lourdes Ortega•Applied Linguistics•2009

  • Syntactic complexity across proficiency and languages

    Open Access•Folkert Kuiken, Ineke Vedder•International Journal of Applied…•2019

  • Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited

    Open Access•Hyung‐Jo Yoon•System•2017

  • N-gram measures and L2 writing proficiency

    Open Access•James Garner, Scott A Crossley et al.•System•2018

  • Morphological complexity in written L2 texts

    Open Access•Vaclav Brezina, Gabriele Pallotti•Second language Research•2016

  • The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research

    Open Access•Magali Paquot•Second language Research•2017

  • Multiple approaches to complexity in second language research

    Open Access•Alex Housen, Bastien De Clercq et al.•Second language Research•2018

  • The Linguistic Development of Students of English as a Second Language in Two Written Genres

    Open Access•Hyung-Jo Yoon, Hyung‐Jo Yoon et al.•TESOL Quarterly•2017

  • A Corpus‐Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College‐Level ESL Writers' Language Development

    Open Access•Xiaofei Lu•TESOL Quarterly•2011

  • The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English

    Diane Larsen‐freeman, D Larsen-Freeman•Applied Linguistics•2006

  • Task Complexity and Second Language Narrative Discourse

    Open Access•Peter Robinson•Language Learning•1995

  • How Big Is "Big"? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research

    Open Access•Luke Plonsky, Frederick L Oswald•Language Learning•2014

  • A power primer

    Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • Task Effects on Linguistic Complexity and Accuracy

    Open Access•Theodora Alexopoulou, Marije Michel et al.•Language Learning•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae