Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Comparative Study of the Use of Different Risk-Assessment Models in Danish Municipalities

Bibliographic Data

ID10895134
AuthorsKresta Munkholt Sørensen (0000-0001-8430-8982, Metropolitan University College, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume48
Issue1
Pages195-214
Publication date2018-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjsw/bcx030
OpenAlexW2612440163
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited11

Risk-assessment models are widely used in casework involving vulnerable children and families. Internationally, there are a number of different kinds of models with great variation in regard to the characteristics of factors that harm children. Lists of factors have been made but most of them give very little advice on how the factors should be weighted. This paper will address the use of risk-assessment models in six different Danish municipalities. The paper presents a comparative analysis and discussion of differences and similarities between three models: the Integrated Children’s System (ICS), the Signs of Safety (SoS) model and models developed by the municipalities themselves (MM). The analysis will answer the following two key questions: (i) to which risk and protective factors do the caseworkers give most weight in the risk assessment? and (ii) does each of the different models ensure a holistic assessment (which is required by law in Denmark)? The study contributes to the discussion about the use of risk-assessment models and whether these newer models have actually made a difference in what is assessed when looking at families at risk.

Actuarial science · Business · Computer security · Danish · Environmental health · Harm · Risk analysis (engineering) · Risk assessment · Risk model · Variation (astronomy) · Child Abuse and Trauma · Computer Science · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · Medicine · Psychology · Research in Social Sciences · Social Psychology

  • Signs of Safety

    Open Access•Mary Baginsky, Jo Moriarty et al.•Journal of Children s Services•2019

  • Social workers’ risk assessment in child protection

    Morten Ejrnæs, Cecilie Kolonda Moesby-Jensen•European Journal of Social Work•2021

  • Professionals’ tinkering with standardised tools

    Open Access•Marina Snipsøyr Sletten, Catharina Bjørkquist•European Journal of Social Work•2020

  • Making Sense of Risk

    Ravit Alfandari, Brian J Taylor et al.•Health Risk & Society•2023

  • Research-based Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment

    Open Access•Brenda Erens, Corine De Ruiter et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  • Assessment as a Site of Anti/Oppressive Social Work Practice

    Open Access•Eunjung Lee•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  • Does it feel right?—Emotional and embodied processes as a ‘shadowy epistemology’ in difficult child protection cases

    Open Access•Line Søberg Bjerre, Maria Appel Nissen•The British Journal of Social Work•2021

  • Making sense of decision support systems

    Open Access•Andreas Møller Jørgensen, Maria Appel Nissen•Big Data & Society•2022

  • Technology, evidence and professional practice

    Open Access•Ian F Shaw, Jasmine Clayden•Journal of Children s Services•2009

  • Improving practice

    Open Access•Eileen Munro•Children and Youth Services Review•2005

  • Modeling the reliability and predictive validity of risk assessment in child protective services

    Open Access•Michael J Camasso, Ram Jagannathan et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2000

  • Learning to Reduce Risk in Child Protection

    Emily R Munro, E Munro•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • An Exemplary Scheme? An Evaluation of the Integrated Children's System

    Ian F Shaw, I SHAW et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2009

Citations per year1.14
Citation span2019 - 2023 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae