Exploring the Usefulness and Validity of Democratic Professionalism for Social Work Practice
A Cross-National Qualitative Case Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10896311 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michelle van der Tier (0000-0001-9138-4529, KU Leuven, corresponding author), Koen Hermans (0000-0003-2992-8972, KU Leuven), Marianne Potting (KU Leuven) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 2894-2910 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjsw/bcab208 |
| OpenAlex | W3215783239 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
Democratic professionalism challenges social workers to see social institutions as potential fields for democratic action and to act as bridge agents between citizens and social institutions. Although scholars have identified democratic professionalism as a promising theory, the relevance of this approach has hardly been empirically explored and operationalised in social work practice. To address this gap, this article explores empirical examples of bridging practices in social welfare organisations and private shelter organisations in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. Data were gathered by means of a mixed method design (interviews N13, and focus groups N10). Based on our case analysis, we identify three types of practices that aim to close the gap between citizens and social institutions: task-sharing with citizens; raising public awareness about social issues and facilitating a public dialogue about social issues in close proximity to the lives of citizens. We found indications that the policy environment shapes both the relationship between social institutions and society, and social workers’ actions and beliefs. Although we conclude that democratic professionalism is a promising theory for social work, more research is needed to further substantiate our findings and to explore the relevance of other aspects of democratic professionalism for social work practice
Bridge (graph theory) · Democracy · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Relevance (law) · Social philosophy · Social relation · Social science · Sociology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work
Ethics, Accountability and the Social Professions
Ethics and Values in Social Work
Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy
The Nonprofit Sector in Germany. Between State, Economy and Society
Statistical Adhockeries Are No Criteria for Legal Decisions—The Case of the Expert Medical Report on the Assessment of Urine Specimens Collected Among Athletes Having Participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
Public Participation in Health and Social Care
Talking Active Citizenship
Liquid advocacy
The professionalisation of social work
Unheard voices
Is Social Work a Profession
Social work in municipalities
Social Workers' Implementation of Client Participation
Administrative Buy-in for User Participation in Managing Social Services
Linking macro‐level mechanisms to street‐level accountability practices. A cross‐national case study of street‐level accountability of social workers in government funded homeless shelters
Socializing Democracy
Engaging with Involuntary Service Users in Social Work
Relational Autonomy and Service Choices in Social Worker–Client Conversations in an Outpatient Clinic for People Using Drugs
Consumer participation at Specialist Homelessness Services
American Nightmare
Keeping the Lights On
The Case for Comparative Ethnography
Rethinking the Public Sphere
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |