Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Complexity of Fidelity in Measuring System Change

The Case of Family Group Decision Making

Bibliographic Data

ID10896407
AuthorsLisa Merkel‐holguin (0000-0001-8586-5449, Children's Hospital Colorado, corresponding author), L Merkel-Holguin, Lyscha A Marcynyszyn (0000-0001-5217-4748)
Year2015
Volume45
Issue2
Pages724-736
Publication date2015-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjsw/bcu092
OpenAlexW2128113826
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited7

Family Group Decision Making (FGDM) is used internationally, positioning families to lead decision making, in partnership with statutory authorities, when their children are the subjects of child maltreatment reports. Widely absent has been the measurement of FGDM fidelity. This leaves various stakeholders (programme administrators, policy makers, researchers, social workers and others) with insufficient knowledge about the cohesion between the family meeting processes and the core principles and practices that underpin FGDM. This article, therefore, presents rationales for pursuing fidelity, reviews the limited literature on FGDM fidelity, highlights the inconsistencies between previous fidelity tools and the widely accepted practices and principles enshrined by the FGDM Guidelines Committee (2013), and presents new fidelity measures that better align with the guidelines. It advocates for widespread infusion of fidelity measures into FGDM processes for purposes of evaluation, quality assurance and improvement, and inclusion of the perspectives of family groups in all components of service delivery and programme design.

Fidelity · General partnership · Inclusion (mineral) · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Statutory law · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • A principles-based approach to evaluating family engagement group strategies

    Marlo A Perry, Mary Elizabeth Rauktis et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2021

  • A Multiple-Path Model of Workforce Development for Improving the Fidelity of Family Team Conference in the Child Welfare System

    Jangmin Kim, Barbara Pierce•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2022

  • Building evidence for family group decision-making in child welfare

    Marina Lalayants, Diane DePanfilis et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2021

  • Development of a Conceptual Model for Restorative Approach in Family Service Provision

    Open Access•Anne Williams, Jeremy Segrott•Social Policy and Society•2017

  • Nothing about me without me

    Open Access•Lisa Merkel‐holguin, Laura M Schwab‐reese et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2019

  • Model Fidelity and Child Well-Being in Family Team Conference

    Open Access•Jangmin Kim, Mijin Choi et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  • Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptation in Family-Based Prevention Interventions

    Open Access•Karol L Kumpfer, Rose Alvarado et al.•Prevention Science•2002

  • Challenges in Measuring the Fidelity of a Child Welfare Service Intervention

    Amy Stuczynski, Madeleine H Kimmich•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2010

  • A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation

    Open Access•Jeanne Century, Mollie Rudnick et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2010

  • Family group decision making

    Open Access•Mary Elizabeth Rauktis, Lauren Bishop et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2013

  • Implementation fidelity of Team Decisionmaking

    Open Access•Thomas M Crea, Charles L Usher et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2009

  • An Esid Case Study at the Federal Level

    Open Access•James G Emshoff, James Emshoff et al.•American Journal of Community…•2003

  • Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited

    John R Weisz, Bahr Wei et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1995

Citations per year0.67
Citation span2017 - 2022 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae