Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A principles-based approach to evaluating family engagement group strategies

Lessons from a IV-E Waiver Demonstration Project

Bibliographic Data

ID12803196
AuthorsMarlo A Perry (University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Mary Elizabeth Rauktis (0000-0002-0161-9337, University of Pittsburgh), Helen Cahalane (University of Pittsburgh)
Year2021
Volume16
Issue4
Pages533-548
Publication date2021-06-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Public Child Welfare (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1554-8732 • E-ISSN: 1554-8740
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15548732.2021.1931629
OpenAlexW3169611495
LanguageEN
References cited16

Family engagement conferences are a commonly utilized strategy in child welfare to empower families to make decisions for the safety and well-being of their own children. However, there is mixed evidence about their effectiveness, in large part due to the lack of detail about what is actually occurring in those conferences. Using data from a Title IV-E waiver, the present study utilized a principles-focused evaluation approach to explore how well a set of different family engagement models employed across six county child welfare systems adhered to a common set of principles. Findings suggest that the specific name or branding of a family engagement model – and their model-specific practices, such as private family time – matters less than the general components of practice and fidelity with which they are carried out. Further, this study provides evidence for the ability to conduct an evaluation of similar – but not identical – conferencing models across multiple sites

Alternative medicine · Evidence-based practice · Fidelity · Political science · Set (abstract data type · Waiver · Welfare · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Computer Science · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice

  • Challenges in Measuring the Fidelity of a Child Welfare Service Intervention

    Amy Stuczynski, Madeleine H Kimmich•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2010

  • Family participation in child protection practice

    Open Access•Karen Healy, Yvonne Darlington et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2011

  • Responsive Regulation in Child Welfare

    Paul Adams, Susan Chandler et al.•The Journal of Sociology & Social…•2004

  • Family group decision making

    Open Access•Mary Elizabeth Rauktis, Lauren Bishop et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2013

  • Expedited family group engagement and child permanency

    Open Access•Joan Pennell, Myles Edwards et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2010

  • New roles for families in child welfare

    Open Access•Erin Williamson, Aracelis Gray•Children and Youth Services Review•2011

  • Outcomes of family centered meetings for families referred to Child Protective Services

    Open Access•Catherine A Labrenz, Rowena Fong•Children and Youth Services Review•2016

  • Child welfare involvement and contexts of poverty

    Open Access•K Fong•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Family group decision making

    Open Access•Elizabeth Weigensberg, Elizabeth C Weigensberg et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2009

  • Assessing Model Fidelity in Two Family Group Decision-Making Programs

    Stephanie Cosner Berzin, Karen L Thomas et al.•Journal of Social Service Research•2007

  • The Complexity of Fidelity in Measuring System Change

    Lisa Merkel‐holguin, L Merkel-Holguin et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae