Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Powers to Detain under Mental Health Legislation in England and the Role of the Approved Social Worker

An Analysis of Patterns and Trends under the 1983 Mental Health Act in Six Local Authorities

Bibliographic Data

ID10898917
AuthorsBarbara Hatfield (University of Manchester, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume38
Issue8
Pages1553-1571
Publication date2007-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjsw/bcm046
OpenAlexW2080221480
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited23

The study reported makes use of an existing database in order to examine a group of individuals assessed by approved social workers (ASWs) under the Mental Health Act, with a view to detention in psychiatric hospital. The study aims to develop a profile of these individuals, their pathways to assessment and the outcome of the assessments, and to examine the social implications of the findings. The study also seeks to identify changes over a nine-year period. The role of the ASW is reviewed in the light of the analysis of the nine-year information. Key features in the social situations of individuals are identified that may be associated with mental health need. Specific aspects of gender and life-stage vulnerability are suggested, as are poor material resources, isolation and lifestyle issues such as drug and alcohol misuse. The close association of psychiatric severity and social disadvantage is evident, presenting assessing ASWs with challenging and complex assessments. Mental health social workers are uniquely equipped to identify issues in the social context that may contribute to mental health crisis. Interventions underpinned by social approaches, including social inclusion and the recovery model, have the potential to help provide services in the longer term that provide social support and minimize the need for crisis admission.

Context (archaeology) · Disadvantage · Legislation · Mental health · Mental Health Act · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Social isolation · Vulnerability (computing) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Homelessness and Social Issues · Psychiatric care and mental health services · Psychology

  • Contact Between Police and People With Mental Disorders

    James D Livingston, James Livingston•Psychiatric Services•2016

  • An Audit of Assessment and Reporting by Approved Social Workers (ASWs)

    Gavin Davidson, Jim Campbell•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • Policing and mental health

    Open Access•Arabella Kyprianides, Ben Bradford•The Police Journal Theory…•2025

  • Coercion in the Community

    Jim Campbell, Gavin Davidson•Ethics and Social Welfare•2009

  • Compounding the trauma

    Bob Sapey•European Journal of Social Work•2012

  • What Does the ‘A’ Stand for? Exploring the Process of AMHP ‘Re-Approval’ and Opportunities for Improvement

    George Mearns•Practice•2022

  • Facilitating the ‘Least Restrictive Option and Maximising Independence’ under Section 115 Mental Health Act 1983

    Rachael Rooke•Practice•2020

  • Minimising Coerciveness in Coercion

    Chris Maylea•Australian Social Work•2017

  • Power as Perceived in MHA Assessment Contexts

    Rosie Buckland•Practice•2020

  • Decision Making by Practitioners in the Social Professions Involved in Compulsory Admission to Mental Health Hospital

    Open Access•Abbott•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

  • Social workers’ perceptions and experiences on the psychiatric disease mandatory assessment review committee

    Open Access•I-Chen Tang, Huang-Chang Wu et al.•International Social Work•2013

  • Work with People in Mental Distress Who Access Spirituality/Religion

    Open Access•Stewart J Smith, Stewart Smith et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  • Role Over’ or Roll Over? Dirty Work, Shift and Mental Health Act Assessments

    Open Access•Sarah Vicary, A Young et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2019

  • Deciding to Detain

    Jim Campbell•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • The Decision by Approved Mental Health Professionals to Use Compulsory Powers under the Mental Health Act 1983

    Rosie Buckland•The British Journal of Social Work•2016

  • The Mental Health Act Assessment Process and Risk Factors for Compulsory Admission to Psychiatric Hospital

    Open Access•Alice Wickersham, Shilpa Nairi et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2020

  • Approved Mental Health Professionals’ Experiences of Moral Distress

    Open Access•Jill Hemmington•The British Journal of Social Work•2024

  • The 1983 Mental Health Act in Five Local Authorities

    Open Access•Barbara Hatfield, Hadi Mohamad et al.•International Journal of Social…•1992

  • Assessment of parents by Approved Social Workers under the Mental Health Act 1983

    Jeni Webster, Barbara Hatfield et al.•Practice•1999

  • Learning collectively to collectively learn training for Emergency Duty Teams

    Martin Smith•Practice•1999

  • Detention under the Mental Health Act

    Barbara Hatfield, Valerie Antcliff•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2001

  • Reforming the Mental Health Act 1983

    Patricia Walton•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2000

Unique citing works17
Citations per year1
Citation span2009 - 2025 (17)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae