Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intragroup social influence processes in intergroup behavior

Bibliographic Data

ID10900987
AuthorsEddy Van Avermaet (KU Leuven, corresponding author), Herman Buelens (KU Leuven), Norbert Vanbeselaere (KU Leuven), Griet Van Vaerenbergh (KU Leuven)
Year1999
Volume29
Issue5-6
Pages815-823
Publication date1999-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0046-2772 • E-ISSN: 1099-0992
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<815::aid-ejsp967>3.0.co;2-z
OpenAlexW2060901296
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

In line with a social-support-for-shared-self-interest interpretation of competitive intergroup behavior Schopler, Insko, Graetz, Drigotas, Smith and Dahl (1993) observed that, in the face of consistent cooperative outgroup behavior, two ingroup members behaved competitively when this strategy had been suggested by another (role-playing) ingroup member. Because a comparable amount of competitive PDG-choosing was observed in a no-suggestion condition with two subjects and one neutral role player (single no-suggestion condition), Schopler et al. assumed that the two subjects, motivated by greed, each initiated and supported competitive suggestions. Within the boundaries of Schopler et al.'s research paradigm, the present experiment aimed to test this assumption by adding a no-suggestion cooperative feedback condition with two neutral role players, rendering impossible any form of explicit social support. In this double no-suggestion condition a significant reduction of competitive responding was observed, compared to a single no-suggestion condition. Additionally it was observed that the single no-suggestion condition yielded less competition than a manipulated (explicit) competitive suggestion condition. Finally, the new condition still produced more competition than a manipulated (explicit) cooperative suggestion condition. As a whole, our results are in line with predictions derived from the social-support-for-shared-self-interest-hypothesis. Nevertheless, alternative interpretations, calling for further research, are also proposed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Competition (biology) · Ingroups and outgroups · Interpretation (philosophy) · Outgroup · Cultural Differences and Values · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Explanations of interindividual – intergroup discontinuity

    Tim Wildschut, Chester A Insko•European Review of Social…•2007

  • The Discontinuity Effect in Interpersonal and Intergroup Relations

    John Schopler, Chester A Insko•European Review of Social…•1992

Citations per year0.05
Citation span2007 - 2007 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae