Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Election outcomes under different ways to announce preferences

An analysis of the 2015 parliament election in the Austrian federal state of Styria

Bibliographic Data

ID10929474
AuthorsAndreas Darmann (0000-0002-0477-4578, University of Graz, corresponding author), Julia Grundner (University of Graz, corresponding author), Christian Klamler (0000-0003-1225-5943, University of Graz, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume173
Issue1-2
Pages201-216
Publication date2017-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Choice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0048-5829 • E-ISSN: 1573-7101
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11127-017-0472-6
OpenAlexW2746497419
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited23

We use preference data from the 2015 parliament election in the Austrian federal state of Styria to analyze different voting rules. An exit poll right after the election collected data on ordinal and cardinal preferences from approximately 1000 actual voters. Our analysis is threefold. First, we determine the hypothetical social outcomes under different voting rules; second, we investigate the stability of the outcomes under those rules. Finally, we provide a categorization of different types of parties and analyze the impact of certain voting rules (Plurality Rule, Plurality Run Off, Hare System, Condorcet Method, Approval Voting, Borda Rule, Evaluative Voting, and Majority Judgment) on the performances of parties in those scenarios

Anti-plurality voting · Approval voting · Bullet voting · Cardinal voting systems · Categorization · Condorcet method · Disapproval voting · Economics · First-past-the-post voting · Group voting ticket · Majority rule · Microeconomics · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Preference · Ranked voting system · Social choice theory · Split-ticket voting · State (computer science · Voting · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law

  • Do grades have absolute meaning? An experiment on majority judgment

    Open Access•Théo Delemazure, Roberto Brunetti et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2026

  • Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting

    Open Access•Antoinette Baujard, Herrade Igersheim et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • Are Alternative Voting Methods Ideologically Biased? Evidence from the 2022 Italian Election

    Open Access•Simone Marsilio, Théo Delemazure•Statistics Politics and Policy•2026

  • Building bridges for consensus via alternative voting methods

    Tanya Gibbs, Jan Oreský et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2024

  • How people understand voting rules

    Open Access•Antoinette Baujard, Roberto Brunetti et al.•Public Choice•2025

  • Does the rule matter? A comparison of preference elicitation methods and voting rules based on data from an Austrian regional parliamentary election in 2019

    Open Access•Andreas Darmann, Christian Klamler•Public Choice•2023

  • Do people make their votes count? An experimental study on voter errors and electoral systems

    Open Access•Zuzana Haase Formánková, Ivan Jarabinský et al.•Public Choice•2026

  • Representing Preferences through Multi-Option Referendums

    Charlotte C L Wagenaar, T W G Tom Van Der Meer et al.•Representation•2025

  • Does the Choice of Preferential Voting Method Matter? An Empirical Study Using Ranked Choice Elections in the United States

    David Mccune, Lori Mccune•Representation•2024

  • Designing preference voting

    Open Access•Philipp Harfst, Damien Bol et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    Kenneth J Arrow, Eric S Maskin•Social Choice and Individual Values•2017

  • Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy

    Open Access•Peter Emerson•Designing an All-Inclusive…•2007

  • Voting methods, problems of majority rule, and demand-revealing procedures

    Open Access•Michael C Munger•Public Choice•2012

  • Dead Heat

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, Michael W Hansen et al.•Public Choice•2006

  • Two types of participation failure under nine voting methods in variable electorates

    Open Access•Dan S Felsenthal, Hannu Nurmi•Public Choice•2016

  • Plurality, approval, or Borda? A nineteenth century dispute on voting rules

    Open Access•Eerik Lagerspetz•Public Choice•2016

  • Clientelism and Voting Behavior

    Open Access•Leonard Wantchekon•World Politics•2003

  • Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election

    Open Access•Antoinette Baujard, Herrade Igersheim et al.•Electoral Studies•2014

  • Condorcet's Theory of Voting

    Open Access•H P Young•American Political Science Review•1988

Unique citing works10
Citations per year2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae