The size-density hypothesis in Great Britain
Analysis of a deviant case
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10969583 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D S Massey (0000-0002-0109-522X, Office of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, corresponding author), G Edward Stephan (Department of Sociology, Western Washington State College, Bellingham, Washington 98225) |
| Year | 1977 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 351-361 |
| Publication date | 1977-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Demography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0070-3370 • E-ISSN: 1533-7790 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2060791 |
| PMID | 330271 |
| OpenAlex | W1986940602 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 13 |
Recent studies have found size of territorial units to vary inversely with population density, the only exception to this regularity being Great Britain, where size and density were found to be unrelated. The present research accounts for this anomaly by demonstrating Britain’s historical conformity to the size-density relation. The size-density hypothesis is further supported by direct test, made possible by a recent reorganization of British counties. Results show that reorganization has restored the expected inverse relation between size and density and has restructured the size and density of counties in a manner precisely specified by underlying theory
Geography · Sociology · Demography · Economic Theory and Institutions
Locational analysis in human geography
Urban Networks in Russia, 1750-1800, and Premodern Periodization
A Theory of Time-Minimization
Tribal Territories in Africa
Variation in County Size
Tests of the Size-Density Hypothesis
International Tests of the Size-Density Hypothesis
Second Abstract of British Historical Statistics
A Simple Model of London's Importance in Changing English Society and Economy 1650-1750
Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Part I
Marketing and social structure in rural China
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1981 - 1982 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |