Conceptualizing and Defining Public Health Emergency Preparedness

Bibliographic Data

ID11030760
AuthorsChristopher Nelson (0000-0002-3293-3185, Christopher Nelson is with the RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa. Nicole Lurie and Sarah Zakowski are with the RAND Corporation, Arlington, Va. Jeffrey Wasserman is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.), Nicole Lurie (Christopher Nelson is with the RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa. Nicole Lurie and Sarah Zakowski are with the RAND Corporation, Arlington, Va. Jeffrey Wasserman is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.), Jeffrey Wasserman (Christopher Nelson is with the RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa. Nicole Lurie and Sarah Zakowski are with the RAND Corporation, Arlington, Va. Jeffrey Wasserman is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.), Sarah Zakowski (Christopher Nelson is with the RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa. Nicole Lurie and Sarah Zakowski are with the RAND Corporation, Arlington, Va. Jeffrey Wasserman is with the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.)
Year2007
Volume97
IssueSupplement_1
PagesS9-S11
Publication date2007-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2007.114496
PMID17413078
PMCIDPMC1854988
OpenAlexW2095487865
LanguageEN
Citations received65
References cited7

Since September 11, 2001, and the anthrax attacks that followed, a substantial federal investment—totaling well in excess of $5 billion—has been made to increase our nation’s ability to prepare for, and respond to, public health emergencies. Yet despite anecdotal reports suggesting that progress has been made, it is unclear whether these investments have left the nation better prepared to respond to a bioterrorist attack, pandemic influenza, or any other large-scale public health emergency. This situation is not because of a shortage of measures of preparedness. Over the past 5 years, federal agencies, state health departments, and various nongovernmental organizations have proposed and implemented myriad measures of public health emergency preparedness. But these efforts have not resulted in a clear picture of the nation’s preparedness owing to ambiguous and uncertain preparedness goals, a lack of agreement about what the measures should aim at and how they should be interpreted, and a weak system of accountability for producing results.1 Measures often vary considerably across agencies and shift dramatically from year to year, leaving state and local health officials, businesses, nonprofits, and citizens confused and perplexed by a maze of overlapping and sometimes contradictory requirements, checklists, and ideas about what constitutes preparedness.2–4 What our nation needs in order to bring coherence to the debate is a clear definition of public health emergency preparedness and an articulation of the key elements that characterize a well-prepared community. In this editorial, we propose a candidate definition of public health emergency preparedness and describe its key elements. Both the definition and the elements were developed by a diverse panel of experts convened by RAND in February 2007. We propose the following definition: public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) is the capability of the public health and health care systems, communities, and individuals, to prevent, protect against, quickly respond to, and recover from health emergencies, particularly those whose scale, timing, or unpredictability threatens to overwhelm routine capabilities. Preparedness involves a coordinated and continuous process of planning and implementation that relies on measuring performance and taking corrective action. In developing the definition, we considered what constitutes a public health emergency, what public health emergency preparedness requires, and who is involved in it

Accountability · Emergency management · Environmental health · Political science · Preparedness · Public health · Public relations · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Public Health Policies and Education