Comparative educational approaches to screening for colorectal cancer

Bibliographic Data

ID11036588
AuthorsThomas W Elwood, Andrew Erickson (0000-0002-4850-4086), S Lieberman, Stephen F Lieberman
Year1978
Volume68
Issue2
Pages135-138
Publication date1978-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.68.2.135
PMID415624
OpenAlexW2025421391
LanguageEN
Citations received7

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the public's willingness to perform the do-it-yourself Hemoccult Test for colon-rectum cancer and to assess the relative effectiveness of alternative means of persuading people to do the test. American Cancer Society volunteers in four different part of the country contacted a total of 11,115 members of the American Association of Retired Persons, using five methods that differed in the extent of personal and impersonal contact involved. Other variables such as inclusion of postage and dietary restrictions were studied and cost efficiencies were estimated. The Group Meeting Method was the most effective personal distribution method. The Selective Mail-Out Method was the most effective impersonal method. The return rate was higher when postage was provided. Dietary restrictions did not markedly reduce participation. Including digital examinations did not affect the return rate. The findings suggest that the Hemoccult Test has the potential of reaching a significant proportion of the nation's older population

Affect (linguistics) · Cancer · Colorectal cancer · Environmental health · Family medicine · Gynecology · Inclusion (mineral) · Population · Rectum · Sociology · Test (biology) · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Demography · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Surgery · Gerontology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access