Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Nazi Physicians as Leaders in Eugenics and “Euthanasia”

Lessons for Today

Bibliographic Data

ID11040150
AuthorsMichael A Grodin (0000-0002-0929-8929, The authors are with the Center for Health Law, Ethics, and Human Rights at the Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.), Erin L Miller (0000-0002-9570-5307, The authors are with the Center for Health Law, Ethics, and Human Rights at the Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.), Erin Miller (0000-0002-8541-7969, Boston University), Johnathan I Kelly (The authors are with the Center for Health Law, Ethics, and Human Rights at the Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.)
Year2018
Volume108
Issue1
Pages53-57
Publication date2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0090-0036 • E-ISSN: 1541-0048
PublisherAmerican Public Health Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2105/ajph.2017.304120
PMID29161068
OpenAlexW2769260099
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited11

This article, in commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg, reflects on the Nazi eugenics and “euthanasia” programs and their relevance for today. The Nazi doctors used eugenic ideals to justify sterilizations, child and adult “euthanasia,” and, ultimately, genocide. Contemporary euthanasia has experienced a progression from voluntary to nonvoluntary and from passive to active killing. Modern eugenics has included both positive and negative selective activities. The 70th anniversary of the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg provides an important opportunity to reflect on the implications of the Nazi eugenics and “euthanasia” programs for contemporary health law, bioethics, and human rights. In this article, we will examine the role that health practitioners played in the promotion and implementation of State-sponsored eugenics and “euthanasia” in Nazi Germany, followed by an exploration of contemporary parallels and debates in modern bioethics. 1

Criminology · Eugenics · Family medicine · Nazism · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices · Law · Medical History and Research · Medicine · Psychology

  • Cautions About Medicalized Dehumanization

    Open Access•Alexandra Minna Stern•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2021

  • Health Professionals, Human Rights Violations at the US-Mexico Border, and Holocaust Legacy

    Open Access•Susannah Sirkin, Kathryn Hampton et al.•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2021

  • Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying

    Open Access•Valentina Capurri•Canadian Journal of Disability…•2025

  • The Bounds of Compassion? Medical Ethics and the Politics of Medical Mercy Killings in South Africa, 1930s to 1976

    Julie Parle•South African Historical Journal•2022

  • The Biological Reductionism of Eysenck’s Psychology

    Open Access•Tasos Travasaros•Human Arenas•2026

  • Representations of vulnerability, innocence and evil in the murder of a disabled person

    Ian T Mathews, Ian Mathews•Disability & Society•2018

  • Navigating the Institutional Review Board and other institutional entities

    Open Access•Mariah Kornbluh, Michelle Abraczinskas et al.•American Journal of Community…•2024

  • Circumstances affecting patients’ euthanasia or medically assisted suicide decisions from the perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals

    Hongxuan Xu, Sigrid Stjernswärd et al.•Death Studies•2024

  • Human misconnection ? A response to Beuthin and Bruce on medical assistance in dying providers’ lived experience

    Open Access•Charles J Lyons•Death Studies•2025

  • Reflections on the 70th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial

    George J Annas, Michael A Grodin•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • Marking the 70th Anniversary of the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg

    Gail R Wilensky•American Journal of Public Health•2018

  • A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification

    Open Access•David Baltimore, Paul Berg et al.•Science•2015

  • The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context

    Michael Robert Marrus•Bulletin of the history of medicine•1999

  • California’s Sterilization Survivors

    Alexandra Minna Stern, Nicole L Novak et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2017

Unique citing works11
Citations per year1,38
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae