Overpassivization Revisited
Disentangling Syntax and Semantics in Causes of Errors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11052428 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chorong Kang (0000-0001-7806-9444, Seoul National University, corresponding author), Eunjeong Oh (Sangmyung University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 19-19 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Psycholinguistic Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0090-6905 • E-ISSN: 1573-6555 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10936-025-10192-y |
| PMID | 41670891 |
| OpenAlex | W7128599024 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 33 |
English passives and unaccusatives share similarities in both syntactic derivation and semantic properties of the subject argument. However, similarities in syntactic derivation have primarily been discussed in the literature as a core trigger of prevalent overpassivization errors with unaccusative verbs by second language learners of English. In this study, we conducted two experiments to investigate which cue, either syntactic similarity or semantic similarity, is active for incorrectly applying passive frames to unaccusative verbs. The first experiment assessed whether learners represent unaccusatives as sharing a syntactic derivation with passives. Based on the assumption that stress patterns reflect syntactic derivations, participants judged acceptability of stress patterns of intransitives and passives. The results did not provide conclusive evidence that L2 learners treat unaccusatives and passives as sharing a common syntactic derivation. Even the five most native-like learners showed residual optionality, and their divergent performance on passive versus intransitive constructions indicates that highly advanced learners may still lack fully distinct syntactic representations for the two types of intransitives. In the second experiment, we investigated whether learners instead rely on thematic information. The results show that learners consistently rated unaccusative subjects as less agentive than unergative subjects, indicating that they recognize the thematic-role similarity between unaccusatives and passives. Taken together, the findings suggest that semantic similarity between passives and unaccusatives, rather than syntactic identity, drives learners’ overpassivization behavior
Phrase structure rules · Psycholinguistics · Semantic similarity · Semantics (computer science) · Similarity (geometry) · Subject (documents) · Syntactic structure · Syntax · Categorization, perception, and language · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Judgment and Interpretation Tasks in Second Language Research
Verb Meaning and the Lexicon
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
LmerTest Package
Italian Syntax
Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis
Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order
Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian
Animacy Effect and Language Specificity
Nonevent -er nominals
Constituent Length Affects Prosody and Processing for a Dative NP Ambiguity in Korean
Phase theory and prosodic spellout
L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model
Some Interface Properties of the Phase
Second language acquisition at the interfaces
The thetic/categorical distinction revisited
Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs
| Highly cited | No |
|---|