Implementation and Development of Federally‐Funded Systems of Care Over Time
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11054268 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ana María Brannan (0000-0001-9651-0619, Vanderbilt University Nashville TN USA, corresponding author), Freda Brashears (ICF Macro Atlanta GA USA), Phyllis Gyamfi (ICF Macro Atlanta GA USA), Brigitte Manteuffel (ICF Macro Atlanta GA USA) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 467-482 |
| Publication date | 2012-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Community Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0091-0562 • E-ISSN: 1573-2770 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10464-011-9472-8 |
| PMID | 21964990 |
| OpenAlex | W2029996432 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 23 |
This study describes development in federally funded systems of care. Data for this study were collected using the System of Care Assessment that rated grantees’ enactment of system of care principles in the infrastructure and service delivery domains. Data were collected by trained raters who conducted several site visits over the funding period. This study described system development over time across 61 sites and tested whether gains were statistically significant. Latent profile analysis was used to explore whether sites could be meaningfully grouped based on their baseline service delivery domain scores. Differences across groups were tested in terms of community, system, and client characteristics. Differential growth across groups was also examined. Overall, systems of care developed over time in both the infrastructure and service delivery domains. Although infrastructure scores were generally lower than service delivery scores, greater gains were seen for the infrastructure domain. Three groups of sites were identified that could be distinguished in terms of degree of development overall, and for specific system of care principles. The groups of sites differed in terms of community factors, system features, and client characteristics. In addition, repeated measures analyses found differential growth in system development over time across groups
Environmental health · Health psychology · Public health · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Systemic Intervention
Applied Latent Class Analysis
Latent Class Cluster Analysis
Developing operating principles for systems change
The state of methods and tools for social systems change
Putting the system back into systems change
Lessons learned in systems change initiatives
Transforming Mental Health Care for Children and Their Families
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |