Strategies for monitoring mentoring relationship quality to predict early program dropout
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11055431 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael D Lyons (0000-0002-2675-1131, Department of Human Services, School of Education and Human Development University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA, corresponding author), Kelly D Edwards (0000-0001-5697-1699, Department of Human Services, School of Education and Human Development University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 127-138 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Community Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0091-0562 • E-ISSN: 1573-2770 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajcp.12585 |
| PMID | 35230715 |
| OpenAlex | W4214508815 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 33 |
We examined data from a nationally implemented mentoring program over a 4‐year period, to identify demographic and relationship characteristics associated with premature termination. Data were drawn from a sample of 82,224 mentor and mentees. We found matches who reported shared racial or ethnic identities were associated with lower likelihood of premature termination as was mentee's positive feelings of the relationship. We also found that, if data were used as a screening tool, the data were suboptimal for accuracy classifying premature closure with sensitivity and specificity values equal to 0.43 and 0.75. As programs and policymakers consider ways to improve the impact of mentoring programs, these results suggest programs consider the types of data being collected to improve impact of care
Dropout (neural networks) · Health psychology · Public health · Quality (philosophy) · Applied Psychology · Career Development and Diversity · Computer Science · Medicine · Mentoring and Academic Development · Nursing · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies · Psychology
Strategies for monitoring mentoring relationship quality to predict early program dropout
Linking out-of-school online mentoring and in-school STEM clubs to support girls in STEM
Ethnic-Racial (Mis)Match between Mentors and Mentees on Perceived Strength of Relationship
Building Bridges in STEM Education
I wished I could have said bye
Mentor-mentee similarity in college peer mentoring
Striving for safety, impact, and equity
Unlocking the transformative power of mentoring for youth development in communities, schools, and talent domains
Social acceptance from peers and youth mentoring
Dropping out of an online mentoring program for girls in STEM
Testing Measurement Invariance and Comparing Latent Factor Means Within a Confirmatory Factor Analysis Framework
Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes
A Model of Youth Mentoring
How Effective Are Mentoring Programs for Youth? A Systematic Assessment of the Evidence
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies
Mentoring Relationships and Programs for Youth
Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
An Integrative Model for the Study of Developmental Competencies in Minority Children
The Taboo Against Explicit Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Psychology
It’s Not a Bug, It’s a Feature
Applying a Social Justice Lens to Youth Mentoring
Promoting Successful Youth Mentoring Relationships
Measurement invariance conventions and reporting
The ups and downs of mentoring relationship formation
The Test of Time
Finding the Sweet Spot
Strategies for monitoring mentoring relationship quality to predict early program dropout
Predictors of Premature Match Closure in Youth Mentoring Relationships
Strengthening and Expanding Child Services in Low Resource Communities
Birds of a feather
Mentoring programs
The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs
From Alienation to Efficacy
Breaking Up Is Hard to Do
Validating a Mentoring Relationship Quality Scale
| Citations per year | 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |