Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Imaginary Drug Control and the Failures of Contemporary Australian Drug Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID11057442
AuthorsMargaret Pereira (0000-0003-0959-8734, Queensland University of Technology, corresponding author), John Scott (0000-0002-1672-4199, Queensland University of Technology), Amanda Beem (Queensland University of Technology)
Year2020
Volume47
Issue1
Pages29-42
Publication date2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Drug Problems (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0091-4509 • E-ISSN: 2163-1808
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0091450920905372
OpenAlexW3011620813
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited34

Contemporary Australian drug policy is characterized by a tension between punitive law and order responses that invoke the myth of sovereign power and responsibilizing strategies that “(re)moralize” individuals, holding them responsible for their safety, security, and well-being. This article argues that this blending of neoliberal techniques of governance, such as harm minimization, with neoconservative methods of rule typified in prohibitionist policies, presents a paradoxical policy response to illicit drug use. We explore the development and contemporary practice of a dualistic Australian drug policy that, on the one hand, promotes pragmatic interventions based on harm reduction while, on the other, relies on law and order strategies and traditional penal powers to deter illicit drug use. Drawing on Pat Carlen’s concept of imaginary penalities, we argue that this imaginary form of drug control is underpinned largely by symbolic measures that, in attempting to address public demands for safety and security, reproduce a punitive form of governance that fails to achieve its desired outcomes. Using qualitative interview data from a sample of 29 people who used drugs, and 15 professionals working in the drugs field, this article investigates responses to the contemporary governance of illicit drugs in Queensland. Based on the research findings, we argue that the conjoined nature of Australian drugs governance can be understood as imaginary drug control because it constantly recreates the conditions that perpetuate drug-related harm

Business · Corporate governance · Crime control · Criminal justice · Drug control · Harm · Harm reduction · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public health · Punitive damages · Sociology · Sovereignty · The Imaginary · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Law · Medicine · Psychology

  • The impact of pseudoephedrine regulation at Australian pharmacies through Project Stop

    Open Access•Samuel Brookfield, Coral Gartner•Drug and Alcohol Review•2024

  • A reflection on improving the lives of people who use and inject drugs

    Open Access•Maureen Steele•Drug and Alcohol Review•2024

  • Experiences with compounding surveillance and social control as a barrier to safe consumption service access

    Open Access•Carolyn Greene, Marta-Marika Urbanik et al.•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2022

  • Operational and contextual barriers to accessing supervised consumption services in two Canadian cities

    Open Access•Marta-Marika Urbanik, Marta‐marika Urbanik et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2021

  • Framing drug policy reform

    Open Access•Oskar Sachs, P Kelaita et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2026

  • Choreographing, tailoring and dialoguing care in residential rehabilitation

    Open Access•Ramez Bathish, Cameron Duff et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2025

  • Urine Samples and Drug-Body-Treatment Assemblages

    Open Access•Mats Ekendahl, Petra Kvarmans et al.•Contemporary Drug Problems•2024

  • The Culture of Control

    David Garland•Culture of Control•2001

  • A critical review of the harm minimization ideology in Australia

    Open Access•Peter G Miller•Critical Public Health•2001

  • Criminal Justice and Political Cultures

    Tim Newburn, Richard Sparks•Criminal Justice and Political…•2012

  • Addiction and personal responsibility as solutions to the contradictions of neoliberal consumerism

    Open Access•Robin Room•Critical Public Health•2011

  • Harm reduction as paradigm

    Open Access•GORDON ROE•Critical Public Health•2005

  • Governing through problems

    Open Access•Fraser, David Moore•International Journal of Drug…•2011

  • Articulating addiction in alcohol and other drug policy

    Open Access•Fraser•International Journal of Drug…•2016

  • Understanding policy persistence—The case of police drug detection dog policy in NSW, Australia

    Open Access•Caitlin Hughes, Caitlin E Hughes et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2017

  • Examining the construction and representation of drugs as a policy problem in Australia's National Drug Strategy documents 1985–2010

    Open Access•K Lancaster, A Ritter•International Journal of Drug…•2014

  • Governing drug use through partnerships

    Open Access•Natalie Thomas, Melissa Bull et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2016

  • Volatile and Contradictory Punishment

    Open Access•Pat O’malley•Theoretical Criminology•1999

  • Problematizations in Alcohol Policy

    Open Access•Carol Bacchi•Contemporary Drug Problems•2015

  • Enacting Alcohol and Other Drug (Testing)-Related Harms in an Australian Drug Court

    Open Access•Eliana Sarmiento, Kate Seear et al.•Contemporary Drug Problems•2019

  • Knowledge, Embodiment and Neo-Liberal Drug Policy

    Open Access•Robin Bunton•Contemporary Drug Problems•2001

  • With Scenes of Blood and Pain

    Thomas Linnemann, Lisa Hanson et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2013

  • Government and Control

    Nikolas Rose•The British Journal of Criminology•2000

  • The Limits of the Sovereign State

    D GARLAND, Diana S Richmond Garland•The British Journal of Criminology•1996

  • Drugs, Crime and Social Exclusion

    Toby Seddon•The British Journal of Criminology•2006

  • What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze

    Open Access•Allan Mcconnell•Public Policy and Administration•2015

  • The Never-Ending Drug War

    Open Access•Renee G Scherlen, Renee Scherlen•PS Political Science & Politics•2012

  • Irrational Addicts and Responsible Pleasure Seekers

    Open Access•Margaret Pereira, K Carrington•Critical Criminology•2016

  • Don't leave us this way

    Open Access•Lisa Maher•International Journal of Drug…•2002

  • The legacy of 'normalisation

    Open Access•Fiona Measham, Michael Shiner•International Journal of Drug…•2009

  • Governmentality' and the Problem of Crime

    Open Access•David Garland•Theoretical Criminology•1997

  • The addict as victim

    Open Access•Kate Seear, Fraser•International Journal of Drug…•2014

  • Frameworks of Inquiry in the Sociology of Punishment

    David Garland, David E Garland•British Journal of Sociology•1990

  • Putting at risk what we know

    Open Access•David Moore, David B Moore et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • Harm reduction and the ethics of drug use

    Margaret Pereira, John Scott•Health Sociology Review•2017

  • The normalizing role of rationalist assumptions in the institutional embedding of neoliberalism

    Cameron Hay, Colin Hay•Economy and Society•2004

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,4
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae