Student Evaluation of Teaching
Some Cautions and Suggestions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11063207 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Theodore C Wagenaar (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64 |
| Publication date | 1995-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Teaching Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0092-055X • E-ISSN: 1939-862X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1319382 |
| OpenAlex | W2333520694 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
too busy doing research and therefore are inadequate teachers. Students and faculty disagree on the characteristics of an excellent teacher. Student ratings of instruction are easily biased by the instructor's popularity. Students can easily judge professors' knowledge of subject. Faculty can manipulate student ratings by giving lots of high grades. Student ratings are notoriously unreliable and completely invalid. Student ratings of instruction have no connection with cognitive outcomes. First-year instructors are the most enthusiastic teachers and therefore re
Higher education · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Sociology · Teaching method · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology
One piece of the puzzle
Determinants of effective instructors in higher education institutions
The purpose and use of objective structured teaching encounters (Oste) in faculty development programmes
Student evaluation of instruction in higher education
How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations
Missing the forest for the trees
Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness
Teaching Statistics from the User's Perspective
| Citations per year | 0.27 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1996 - 2026 (31) |
| Highly cited | No |