How Does Rating Specific Features of an Experience Alter Consumers' Overall Evaluations of That Experience
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11074754 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katie S Mehr (0000-0003-4941-3183, University of Alberta, corresponding author), Joseph P Simmons (0000-0002-8833-224X, University of Pennsylvania) |
| Editors | Stacy Wood (0000-0001-5256-1772), Stephen A Spiller (0000-0001-6951-6046) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 739-760 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jcr/ucae005 |
| OpenAlex | W4391172998 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 83 |
How does the way companies elicit ratings from consumers affect the ratings that they receive? In 10 pre-registered experiments, we find that consumers rate subpar experiences more positively overall when they are also asked to rate specific aspects of those experiences (e.g., a restaurant's food, service, and ambiance). Studies 1–4 established the basic effect across different scenarios and experiences. Study 5 found that the effect is limited to being asked to rate specific features of an experience, rather than providing open-ended comments about those features. Studies 6–9 provided evidence that the effect does not emerge because rating positive aspects of a subpar experience reminds consumers that their experiences had some good features. Rather, it emerges because consumers want to avoid incorporating negative information into both the overall and the attribute ratings. Lastly, study 10 found that asking consumers to rate attributes of a subpar experience reduces the predictive validity of their overall rating. We discuss implications of this work and reconcile it with conflicting findings in the literature
Business · Cognitive psychology · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Marketing · Psychology · Social Psychology
Measuring Service Quality
When Online Reviews Meet Hyperdifferentiation
The effect of rating scale format on response styles
Word of mouth and interpersonal communication
Misresponse to Reversed and Negated Items in Surveys
The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance
Service Quality
RCTs to Scale
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Logic and Conversation
Nature and Operation of Attitudes
Context Effects in Attitude Surveys
Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior
Attention and weight in person perception
Navigating by the Stars
Integrating Multiple Opinions
An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement
Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences
The pitfall of experimenting on the web
Bad is Stronger than Good
Self-reports
Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement
Seeing Stars
Why Is the Crowd Divided? Attribution for Dispersion in Online Word of Mouth
Communication Channels and Word of Mouth
Price Endings, Left-Digit Effects, and Choice
Penny Wise and Pound Foolish
Coping with Ambivalence
Capturing and Creating Public Opinion in Survey Research
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |