Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Felony Justice

An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID11100465
AuthorsWolf Heydebrand (corresponding author), J P Eisenstein (0000-0001-5460-0464), Herbert Jacob
Year1981
Volume10
Issue2
Pages229
Publication date1981-03-01
Open AccessNo
TypeREVIEW
Review ofFelony justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts, James Eisenstein, 1991
VenueContemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0094-3061 • E-ISSN: 1939-8638
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2066877
OpenAlexW2008656711
LanguageEN

In a break with prior research, this book compares the disposition of 4500 felony defendants' cases in Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit in 1972, examining the role of judge, prosecutors and defense attorneys by relying on observation and the interview process. Descriptions of the factors shaping the outcomes of preliminary hearings, courtroom dispositions, and sentences rely on multivariate analysis of case and defendant variables drawn from court and prosecutor files. It uses the organizational approach to analyze and interpret the results, providing a model widely used and cited for broader studies. Originally published in 1977 by Little, Brown and Company

Business · Criminal justice · Criminology · Organizational analysis · Organizational commitment · Organizational justice · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • What Teams Do

    Open Access•Anna D Gibson•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Understanding guilty pleas through the lens of social science

    Allison D Redlich, Miko M Wilford et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2017

  • Authoritarian legality and informal practices

    Open Access•Peter H Solomon•Communist and Post-Communist…•2010

  • Sentencing Recommendations by Probation Officers and Judges

    Michael J Leiber, Maude Beaudry-Cyr et al.•Women & Criminal Justice•2018

  • New Directions in Intersections, Inequality, and Sentencing

    Janne E Gaub, Kristy Holtfreter•Women & Criminal Justice•2015

  • Heightened Sensitivity to Conflict on the Part of Female Criminal Defenders

    David R Lynch•Women & Criminal Justice•2000

  • Rethinking Judicial Paternalism

    Open Access•Kathleen Daly•Gender & Society•1989

  • Court Context and Discrimination

    Open Access•Aaron Kupchik, Angela Harvey•Sociological Perspectives•2007

  • Sentencing, Trends, and Disparities

    Open Access•Mindy S Bradley, J T Ulmer•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Interactions and Identities in UK Asylum Appeals

    Open Access•Jessica Hambly•Asylum Determination in Europe•2019

  • Criminal Prosecutions

    Lauren O’Neill Shermer, Brian D Johnson•Justice Quarterly•2010

  • Minority Youths and Juvenile Justice

    Open Access•Kimberly Kempf-Leonard, Kimberly Kempf‐leonard•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2007

  • Why is There So Little Criminal Justice Theory? Neglected Macro- and Micro-Level Links between Organization and Power

    Open Access•J Hagan•Journal of Research in Crime and…•1989

  • Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions

    Chester L Britt, Chester Britt•Justice Quarterly•2000

  • Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines

    John H Kramer, J T Ulmer•Justice Quarterly•1996

  • Location, location, location

    Paula Kautt, PAULA M KAUTT•Justice Quarterly•2002

  • Citizens' Perceptions of Distributive and Procedural Injustice During Traffic Stops with Police

    Open Access•Robin S Engel•Journal of Research in Crime and…•2005

  • Location and Sentencing

    Open Access•Jose Pina-Sánchez, Diana Grech et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2018

  • Extending a Geographical Perspective to the Study of Jurisdictional Consistency in Sentencing Outcomes

    Open Access•Andrew A Reid, David MacAlister•The British Journal of Criminology•2018

  • Prosecutor Decision-Making Following Juvenile Life Without Parole Sentencing Reform

    Open Access•Leah Ouellet, Jennifer Wareham•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2023

  • Criminal defense work in a sample of arrest hearings in three states of Mexico

    Open Access•Andres F Rengifo, Lorena Avila et al.•Crime Law and Social Change•2023

  • What Exactly Is the Bargain? The Sensitivity of Plea Discount Estimates

    Shi Yan•Justice Quarterly•2022

  • Perpetual Incarceration

    Cassia Spohn, Brian D Johnson•Justice Quarterly•2025

  • Testing an Expanded Model of Deterrence Applied to Guilty Plea Decision Making

    Theodore Wilson, Shi Yan et al.•Justice Quarterly•2026

  • Toward a method for evaluating court actor influences on plea negotiations

    Open Access•Christi Metcalfe•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2021

  • The Focal Concerns of Stalking Victims

    Open Access•Patrick Q Brady, Bradford W Reyns•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2024

  • Between Paternalism and a Gender Perspective

    Open Access•Miguel Quintana-Navarrete, Gustavo Fondevila•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2025

  • The Impact of the Defense Attorney on Plea Decision-Making

    Open Access•Emily Suiter, Christi Metcalfe•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2024

  • Tackling the Issue of Limited Dialogue and Strengthening Collaboration Among Court Actors for Improving the Condition-Setting Process

    Open Access•Loveline C Phillips, Benjamin J Mackey et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2025

  • Juvenile Probation Officer Decision-Making in a Reforming State

    Open Access•Joel Miller, Krissinda Palmer•Criminal Justice and Behavior•2020

  • The Politics of Cultural Differences

    David Calhoun Leege, K D Wald et al.•Politics of Cultural Differences•2002

  • Asylum Determination in Europe

    Open Access•Nick Gill, Anthony Good•Asylum Determination in Europe•2018

  • Plea bargaining in Russia

    Ekaterina Moiseeva•International Journal of…•2017

  • Exploring the origin of sentencing disparities in the Crown Court

    Open Access•Jose Pina-Sánchez, Diana Grech et al.•Social Science Research•2019

  • Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants

    John R Sutton•Social Science Research•2013

  • The Organization and Consequences of Social Pasts in Criminal Courts

    Open Access•J T Ulmer•Sociological Quarterly•1995

  • Court Structure, Defense Attorney Use, and Juvenile Court Decisions

    Open Access•David P Aday•Sociological Quarterly•1986

  • Prosecuting Adolescents in Criminal Courts

    Aaron Kupchik•Social Problems•2003

  • Rape Law Reform and Instrumental Change in Six Urban Jurisdictions

    Open Access•Julie Horney, Cassia Spohn•Law & Society Review•1991

  • Judging the Best Interests of the Child

    Open Access•Julie E Artis•Law & Society Review•2004

  • Mandatory Sentencing and Firearms Violence

    Open Access•Colin Loftin, Milton Heumann et al.•Law & Society Review•1983

  • Rule Departures and Making Law

    Open Access•Martha A Myers•Law & Society Review•1979

  • Trial Judges' Participation in Plea Bargaining

    Open Access•John Paul Ryan, James J Alfini•Law & Society Review•1979

  • The Structure of Discourse in Misdemeanor Plea Bargaining

    Open Access•D W Maynard•Law & Society Review•1984

  • Sentencing and State-Level Racial and Ethnic Contexts

    Open Access•Xia Wang, Daniel P Mears•Law & Society Review•2015

  • Adjudication and Sentencing in A Misdemeanor Court

    Open Access•John Paul Ryan•Law & Society Review•1981

  • Continuity and Change in Patterns of Case Handling

    Open Access•Stephen Daniel, STEPHEN Daniels•Law & Society Review•1985

  • Conflict and Compromise

    Open Access•Robert Moog, Robert S Moog•Law & Society Review•1991

  • State Politics and the Right to Counsel

    Open Access•Andrew Lucas Blaize Davies, Andrew Davies et al.•Law & Society Review•2009

  • The Routinization of Debt Collection

    Open Access•Robert A Kagan•Law & Society Review•1984

  • Plea Bargaining in Historical Perspective

    Open Access•Lawrence M Friedman•Law & Society Review•1979

  • (Un)anticipated Effects of Sentencing Reform on the Disparate Treatment of Defendants

    Open Access•John Wooldredge, Timothy Griffin et al.•Law & Society Review•2005

  • Counties in Court

    Open Access•Wayne N Welsh, Henry N Pontell•Law & Society Review•1991

  • Symbol and Substance

    Open Access•John R Sutton•Law & Society Review•2013

  • Plea Bargaining Policy and State District Court Caseloads

    Open Access•M D Holmes, Howard C Daudistel et al.•Law & Society Review•1992

  • Diverting and Abdicating Judicial Discretion

    Open Access•Alexes Harris•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Race as a Determinant of Criminal Sentences

    Open Access•James L Gibson•Law & Society Review•1978

  • Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of Criminal Courts

    Open Access•David Brereton, Jonathan D Casper•Law & Society Review•1982

  • The Emergent Organization of Plea Bargaining

    John F Padgett•American Journal of Sociology•1985

  • An Empirical Typology of American Metropolitan Juvenile Courts

    Vaughan Stapleton, David P Aday et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1982

  • The Power to Punish

    Rodney L Engen, Sara Steen•American Journal of Sociology•2000

  • Deportation Decisions

    Open Access•Asad L Asad•American Behavioral Scientist•2019

  • Restorative Justice and Earned Redemption

    Open Access•Gordon Bazemore•American Behavioral Scientist•1998

  • Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research

    J T Ulmer•Justice Quarterly•2011

  • The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing

    Jo Dixon•American Journal of Sociology•1995

  • Conviction Odds in Chicago Homicide Cases

    Christine Martin•Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal…•2013

  • Being a Disadvantaged Criminal Defendant

    Open Access•Muriel Clair, Matthew Clair•Social Forces•2020

  • Racist Torture and the Code of Silence

    Open Access•J Hagan, B Mccarthy et al.•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2022

  • An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial Discretion

    Celesta A Albonetti•Social Problems•1991

  • Crime, Social Structure and Criminal Punishment

    George S Bridges, Robert D Crutchfield et al.•Social Problems•1987

  • Cumulative Disadvantage in the American Criminal Justice System

    Megan C Kurlychek, Brian D Johnson•Annual Review of Criminology•2019

  • The Impact of Remote Hearing Policies on Racial Equity in Criminal Case Outcomes During the Pandemic

    Open Access•Heather M Harris•RSF The Russell Sage Foundation…•2023

  • Parental evidence of impact of policy on worst forms of child labour in rural and urban Ghana

    Open Access•Obed Adonteng-Kissi•Journal of International and…•2018

  • Being Part of the “Home Team”

    Open Access•Todd A Collins, Tao L Dumas et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • You Know Baseball? 3 Strikes”

    Open Access•Danielle M Romain•Social Sciences•2021

  • Racial Disparity Under Sentencing Guidelines

    Open Access•Brian D Johnson, Jeong-Gyeong Lee•Sociology Compass•2013

  • Judges’ characteristics and sentencing in Hong Kong

    Open Access•Kevin Kwok‐yin Cheng, Sayaka Ri et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2023

  • Identification, Corroboration, and Charging

    Open Access•Tri Keah S Henry, Alicia L Jurek•Feminist Criminology•2020

  • The Use of Case Studies in Law and Social Science Research

    Open Access•L L Miller•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2018

  • Sociolegal Approaches to the Study of Guilty Pleas and Prosecution

    Open Access•Brian D Johnson, Ryan D King et al.•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2016

  • The Political Economy of Prosecution

    Sanford C Gordon, Gregory A Huber•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2009

  • Plea Bargaining as a Game

    Open Access•Ronald A Harris, J Fred Springer•Review of Policy Research•1984

  • Banishing justice

    Open Access•David M Bierie, Kristen M Budd•Criminology & Public Policy•2021

  • The promise of behavioral economics for understanding decision‐making in the court

    Open Access•Theodore Wilson•Criminology & Public Policy•2019

  • Mandatory sentencing guidelines

    Open Access•John H Kramer•Criminology & Public Policy•2009

  • Fair Game or Foul Play

    Open Access•Audrey M Baricovich•American Politics Research•2024

  • Accountable to what

    Open Access•Geoff Ward, Aaron Kupchik•Punishment & Society•2009

  • Attributes of highly effective criminal defense negotiators

    Open Access•David R Lynch, T David Evans•Journal of Criminal Justice•2002

  • Plea bargaining

    Open Access•Peter F Nardulli•Journal of Criminal Justice•1978

  • Reconceptualizing organizational change in the Comprehensive Gang Model

    Open Access•Erika Gebo, Carolyn Boyes-Watson et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2010

  • Victim/witness noncooperation

    Open Access•Robert C Davis•Journal of Criminal Justice•1983

  • Predicting decisions rendered in criminal appeals

    Open Access•Jimmy J Williams•Journal of Criminal Justice•1991

  • Fifty years post Gault

    Open Access•George W Burru, George W Burruss et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2020

  • Juvenile justice reform and the courtroom workgroup

    Open Access•Erika Gebo, Nena F Stracuzzi et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2006

  • Judges, juries, and the decision to convict

    Open Access•Martha A Myers•Journal of Criminal Justice•1981

  • Court clerks, court administrators, and judges

    Open Access•G Larry Mays, William A Taggart•Journal of Criminal Justice•1986

  • Nature and consequences of dismissals

    Open Access•E Rely Vîlcică•Journal of Criminal Justice•2012

  • Organizational determinants of police discretion

    Open Access•Stephen D Mastrofski, R Richard Ritti et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•1987

  • Drug overdose death rates and criminal sentencing of federal drug offenders in the United States

    Open Access•Alexander Testa, Jeong-Gyeong Lee et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2021

  • Deviation from sentencing guidelines

    Open Access•David B Griswold•Journal of Criminal Justice•1987

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae