Street-Level Actors, Migrants, and Gender
Dealing With Divergent Perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11103249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katerina Glyniadaki (0000-0002-7440-5698, The London School of Economics and Political Science, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 451-478 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Administration & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0095-3997 • E-ISSN: 1552-3039 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00953997211031464 |
| OpenAlex | W3177073348 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 47 |
According to the citizen–agent paradigm, the way street-level bureaucrats view their target population shapes their discretionary behavior. Applying this in the context of the so-called “European Migration Crisis,” this article investigates how street-level actors make sense of their migrant clients and how these conceptual understandings of the “Other” shape their discretionary behavior. Focusing on the divisive issue of gender identities and beliefs, or gender perspectives, this research combines ideas from public administration and social psychology. It shows that street-level actors’ discretionary behavior depends on whether they see the Self-Other difference as fixed or changeable, and as hierarchically organized or not
Conceptual framework · Context (archaeology · Geography · Political science · Population · Social science · Sociology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Management and Organizational Studies · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology
Challenging Borders, Claiming Care
Conceptualising Linguistic Disadvantage in the Context of Diversifying Welfare Institutions
Does Public Accreditation Promote More State-Friendly Decisions at the Street Level
Breaking the rules, but for whom? How client characteristics affect frontline professionals’ prosocial rule-breaking behavior
A not-so 'natural' decision
Deciding on asylum dilemmas
Assembling exits and returns
Pulled Over
Street‐Level Bureaucracy Theory
Working, Shirking, and Sabotage
Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers
Interpersonal perception
When the State Meets the Street
Refugees Welcome
Identity Theory
Cops, Teachers, Counselors
Nonprofits for Hire
Moving between frames
The Myth of Apolitical Volunteering for Refugees
Mixed Services and Mediated Deservingness
The Transformative Effects of Stigma
Dealing with Law in Migration Control
Co-production
State Failure, Polarisation, and Minority Engagement in Germany’s Refugee Crisis
Bureaucratic Discretion, Client Demographics, and Representative Bureaucracy
Verification Across Multiple Identities
Going the Extra Mile? How Street‐level Bureaucrats Deal with the Integration of Immigrants
Reflecting on the Role of Literature in Qualitative Public Administration Research
Double Standards in Frontline Decision Making
Producing a Vision of the Self-Governing Mother
The Incentives of Street-Level Bureaucrats and Inequality in Tax Assessments
Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement Public Policies
Dealing with the Dilemmas
Intersubjectivity
Social Representations, Alternative Representations and Semantic Barriers
Using thematic analysis in psychology
The social construction of reality
Social Equities and Inequities in Practice
Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy
Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test
Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats
State Agent or Citizen Agent
Toward Street-Level Communities of Practice? The Implications of Actor Diversification in Migration Management in Athens and Berlin
Contested control at the margins of the state
Lipstick and Logarithms
Policy implementation and refugee settlement
Doing Gender
Framed Before We Know It
Unpacking the Gender System
Apples and Oranges Revisited
A Mixed Method Approach on Greek Civil Society Organizations Supporting Migrants During the Refugee Crisis
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |