Technology Transfer as a Problem in Interorganizational Relationships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11103486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W Henry Lambright (0000-0001-7141-1235, Maxwell School, Syracuse University, corresponding author), Albert H Teich (Institute for Public Policy Alternatives, State University of New York) |
| Year | 1976 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-54 |
| Publication date | 1976-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Administration & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0095-3997 • E-ISSN: 1552-3039 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/009539977600800103 |
| OpenAlex | W1994028520 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
In the process of developing technologies for defense, space, and atomic energy, the federal government has invented new products and processes that could be useful in solving domestic, social problems. How can such technologies be more effectively transferred? It is argued that an interorganizational approach to technology transfer could help accelerate utilization. Federal agencies, manufac turers, and various public and private users need to work in partnership early in the process if technology is to be transferred. It is suggested that, because the key actors are autonomous and often have conflicting interests with respect to technology, it may be necessary that an outsider-or "broker"-take the lead in bringing them into alliance
Alliance · Business · Computer security · General partnership · Government (linguistics · Key (lock · Knowledge management · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Space (punctuation) · Technology transfer · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Law · Research, Science, and Academia · Technology Assessment and Management
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
| Citation span | 1978 - 1981 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |