Presidential Control and Turnover in Regulatory Personnel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11104181 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kathleen M Doherty (New York University, New York City, USA), Kathleen Doherty (0000-0002-0122-0123, New York University, corresponding author), David E Lewis (0000-0002-0803-0074, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA), Scott Limbocker (0000-0002-6477-8255, U.S. Military Academy at West Point, NY, USA) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 1606-1630 |
| Publication date | 2019-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Administration & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0095-3997 • E-ISSN: 1552-3039 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0095399719875458 |
| OpenAlex | W2974000060 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 32 |
Career executives often occupy administrative positions that determine the pace and content of policy, such as those responsible for developing regulations. Yet, presidential administrations need control over these positions to achieve policy aims. This article considers the extent to which new presidential administrations marginalize career executives in key regulatory positions by transferring responsibilities to another individual and whether the mere expectation of political conflict with a new administration drives career regulators from their positions. Using unique new data on 866 career regulators that led major rulemaking efforts between 1995 and 2013, we demonstrate that turnover among career executives in key regulatory positions increases following a party change in the White House. Turnover also increases during a presidential election year, but this effect is conditioned by bureaucrats’ expectations of the election outcome. Finally, career executives are more likely to depart in response to favorable labor market conditions. Given our findings that turnover in regulatory responsibilities is driven both by presidential marginalization and strategic exit by bureaucrats, we conclude with implications for presidential efforts to control the administrative state
Administration (probate law · Control (management · Economics · Management · Pace · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Public relations · Regulatory state · Rulemaking · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies
Proponents, Caretakers, and the Dynamics of Administrative Leadership Turnover in U.S. Executive Agencies
Perceptions of Political Discrimination and Political Activity Coercion in the Federal Service
Policy-making ou recompensas? Nomeações políticas nos governos municipais brasileiros
Policy-making or rewards
The Politics of Regulatory Oversight
Rulemakers’ Professional Experience and Rulemaking Efficiency in U.S. Federal Agencies
Politicization, bureaucratic closedness in personnel policy, and turnover intention
Interbranch Competition Over Control of Federal Agencies and the Selection of Career Executives
The Politicization Conversation
Democracy, Populism and Public Administration
Mapping Immigration Policy at the Southern Border
Navigating turf wars
Career Civil Servants’ Socially Embedded Responses to Democratic Backsliding
Turnover
Bureaucrats in Campaigns
Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy
Rule Significance and Interbranch Competition in Rulemaking Processes
A government of strangers
Serious Money
Bureaucratic Ambition
What Motivates Bureaucrats?
The Politics of Presidential Appointments
Working, Shirking, and Sabotage
Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics
Public Service Motivation and Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior in Public Organizations
Presidential Administration
Does W hite H ouse Regulatory Review Produce a Chilling Effect and “ Oira Avoidance” in the Agencies
Why Do Bureaucrats Make Campaign Contributions to Presidential Candidates
The Politics of Presidential Appointments
Political Management Strategies and Polical/Career Relationships
So Hard to Say Goodbye? Turnover Intention among U.S. Federal Employees
In the Web of Politics
Politicization and Expertise
Political Appointees and Career Executives
White House Control of Domestic Policy Making
Toward Assessing the Administrative Presidency
Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences
Executive Control and Turnover in the Senior Executive Service
Determinants of Bureaucratic Turnover Intention
Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Pay
Policy Influence, Agency-Specific Expertise, and Exit in the Federal Service
Still Clashing after All These Years
What Makes an Agency Independent
Separated Powers in the United States
Presidential Control of the Senior Civil Service
| Citations per year | 2.43 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |