Hittite u before Vowels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11114526 |
|---|---|
| Authors | E H Sturtevant, George L Trager |
| Year | 1942 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 259 |
| Publication date | 1942-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/410188 |
| OpenAlex | W4233575158 |
| Language | EN |
Nearly all scholars who have worked with the cuneiform Hittite texts have assumed that the language has consonantal u (transcribed w or ṷ ) as well as syllabic u , and consonantal i (transcribed y, j , or ḽ) as well as syllabic i. Although there have been few explicit statements to that effect, it appears that the difference between w and u and between y and i has usually been considered phonemic. At any rate that is the opinion underlying Sturtevant's treatment. Nevertheless there has been a tendency to recognize only w and y before vowels and only u and i before consonants, and such a distribution raises the question whether w and u, y and i are not rather positional variants of the phonemes u and i. The purpose of this discussion is to examine and classify a large enough body of material to settle the question
Hittite language · Linguistics · Ancient Near East History · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|