Some Arguments against Ordered Rules
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11115964 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Twila Lehmann (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 541 |
| Publication date | 1972-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/412032 |
| OpenAlex | W2315853143 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
In line with recent claims, it is argued here that no rules in a transformational grammar should be extrinsically ordered. This claim is examined with respect to four well-known syntactic rules. Arguments which purport to establish that these rules must be extrinsically ordered are shown to be false, and solutions consistent with unordered rules are proposed as alternative explanations to the ordering hypothesis
Epistemology · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1974 - 2011 (38) |
| Highly cited | No |