The Strict Order Fallacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2915921 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andreas Koutsoudas (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 88 |
| Publication date | 1972-03-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/412492 |
| OpenAlex | W2082089507 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 2 |
The question considered here is the correctness of the assumption that transformational rules are extrinsically ordered. One type of argument that has frequently been given in support of this assumption is shown to be invalid: it shows that if the rules in question are to be extrinsically ordered, they must be ordered in some particular way, but it fails to show that the facts cannot be accounted for without imposing extrinsic order on these rules. Thus the assumption that rules are not extrinsically ordered is found to be viable. 1
Economics · Epistemology · Fallacy · Order (exchange) · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Some Arguments against Ordered Rules
Rule Ordering, Interference, and Free Alternation in Phonology
The question of rule ordering
Vowel Alternations in English, German, and Gothic
Guide to Transformational Grammar
The Application of Phonological Rules
On trans-derivational operations
The abandonment of extrinsic rule ordering in generative grammar
Agree as information transmission over dependencies
An introduction to phonological theory
| Citations per year | 0.19 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1972 - 2022 (51) |
| Highly cited | No |