Distributive conflict in a post-Kaleckian model with two classes of workers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11123036 |
|---|---|
| Authors | TAILINY VENTURA (0000-0002-5657-798X, Federal University of São João del-Rei, corresponding author), Fabrício José Missio (0000-0003-4561-6039, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), Jomara Ferreira Chaves Santos (0000-0002-2695-3200, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0101-3157 • E-ISSN: 1809-4538 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/0101-31572026-3674 |
| OpenAlex | W7131816893 |
| SciELO | S0101-31572026000100612 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
This article develops a post-Kaleckian model to evaluate the effects of changes in (functional and personal) income distribution on economic growth. We specifically developed an analytical model that incorporates the inherent conflict between workers and capitalists and the intra-class tensions among workers with different income levels (for both low and high incomes). The findings clarify the expected effects of these distributional variations on the economy’s dynamic demands and accumulation regime. The analysis developed opens up the possibility of advancing this theoretical approach in multiple directions
Distribution (mathematics · Distributive justice · Distributive property · Economic inequality · Income distribution · Inequality · Economic Theory and Policy · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Political Economy and Marxism
Cadrisme within a Post-Keynesian Model of Growth and Distribution
Neo-Kaleckian and Sraffian Controversies on the Theory of Accumulation
Long Period Effective Demand and the Sraffian Supermultiplier
Unproductive Outlays and Capital Accumulation with Target-return Pricing
Financialization and U.S. Income Inequality, 1970–2008
Unemployment and the real wage
| Highly cited | No |
|---|