Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The assessment has become the curriculum

Teachers’ views on the Phonics Screening Check in England

Bibliographic Data

ID11160644
AuthorsJane Carter (0000-0001-6304-1027, University of the West of England Bristol UK, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume46
Issue3
Pages593-609
Publication date2020-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Educational Research Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-1926 • E-ISSN: 1469-3518
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/berj.3598
OpenAlexW3006604055
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited23

The Phonics Screening Check (PSC) was introduced in England in 2012 for Year 1 children (aged 5 and 6). There have been criticisms of the check in relation to its reliability and appropriateness as an assessment for early reading, although advocates of the check see it as a valuable tool in securing progress in early reading. This mixed methods study sought to evaluate the intended and possible unintended consequences of the PSC, foregrounding the voices of children and their teachers. This article reports on findings from the teachers’ data. The study focused initially on questionnaire data from 14 schools (59 teachers) selected for their diversity in relation to attainment data (PSC and reading) and socio‐economic status. Focus groups in seven of the schools (25 teachers) enabled a more in‐depth exploration of teachers’ views and practices in relation to the PSC. The study identified the ‘negative backwash’ of assessment. The PSC was seen as an end in itself, rather than a way of securing progress in one of the skills of reading. It found that, the assessment had become the curriculum, to the detriment of specific groups of learners (higher‐attaining readers and children with English as an Additional Language). Teachers were found to use the assessment processes of the PSC as objectives for teaching rather than using them as the tools of assessment

Assessment for learning · Curriculum · Focus group · Foregrounding · Formative assessment · Literacy · Mathematics education · Medical education · National curriculum · Pedagogy · Phonics · Political science · Primary education · Reading (process) · Relation (database) · Sociology · Teaching method · Whole language · Computer Science · Early Childhood Education and Development · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Medicine · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

  • The politics and pedagogy of teaching literacy in the state of Victoria, Australia

    Open Access•Linda Gawne•Educational Research for Policy…•2026

  • Literacy support in England

    Open Access•Little, Ryan Bramley•Educational Research for Policy…•2026

  • ‘Now we have gym, now we have to perform’

    Open Access•Linda Røset, Ken Green et al.•European Journal of Educational…•2024

  • Literacy histories as opportunities for learning

    Open Access•Teresa Cremin, Helen Hendry•English in Education•2022

  • Exploring primary and secondary students’ experiences of grammar teaching and testing in England

    Open Access•Ian Cushing, Marie Helks•English in Education•2021

  • The passion, pedagogy and politics of reading

    Open Access•Dominic Wyse, Alice Bradbury•English in Education•2022

  • Literacy Research and Its Relationship with Policy

    Uta Papen•Research in the Teaching of English•2023

  • Gaming’ in the English primary school

    Open Access•Soo Sturrock•Journal of Education Policy•2024

  • Beyond the phonics debate

    Open Access•Rachelle Naidu, Stacey Campbell et al.•British Educational Research…•2026

  • How Schools Do Policy

    Stephen Ball, Stephen J Ball et al.•How schools do policy•2011

  • Action Research

    Jack Whitehead, Jean Mcniff•Action Research•2006

  • Doing without believing – enacting policy in the English primary school

    Alice Braun, Meg Maguire•Critical Studies in Education•2018

  • Phonics

    Carole Torgerson, Greg Brooks et al.•Research Papers in Education•2018

  • The ‘datafication’ of early years pedagogy

    Guy Roberts-Holmes, Guy Roberts‐Holmes•Journal of Education Policy•2015

  • The politics of literacy in the context of large‐scale education reform

    Gemma Moss•Research Papers in Education•2009

  • The impact of the Phonics Screening Check on grouping by ability

    Open Access•Alice Bradbury•British Educational Research…•2018

  • Knowledge, education and research

    Open Access•Gemma Moss•British Educational Research…•2016

  • Decoding the phonics screening check

    Open Access•Catherine A Darnell, Jonathan Solity et al.•British Educational Research…•2017

  • Ethics, education policy and research

    Open Access•Sue Ellis, Gemma Moss•British Educational Research…•2014

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Publics, Politics and Power

    Open Access•Janet Newman, John Clarke•Publics, Politics and Power•2009

  • Embracing tension

    Open Access•Xiaoli Hong, Michelle M Falter et al.•Qualitative Research•2017

Citations per year1.8
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae