Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Confounding Methodology and Methods

Bibliographic Data

ID11166276
AuthorsLeone Burton (corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume22
Issue1
Pages171-175
Publication date2001-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Sociology of Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0142-5692 • E-ISSN: 1465-3346
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01425690020030855
OpenAlexW2050782086
LanguageEN
References cited3

One of the big contributions that feminist researchers have made to the community is, in my view, a clarification of the differences between methodology and method. In conventional doctoral theses, the chapter labelled 'Methodology' has frequently consisted of a description of the methods used to pursue the research with no problematisation of the available choices and how these reflect the stance, methodologically, of the researcher. Equally, published articles have been happy to tell the reader what was done, while giving no attention to why or to the values, attitudes and beliefs of the researcher who has made the choices. This assumption that method is simply a technique uninfluenced by the researcher making the choice has been demolished, particularly by many feminists. As Patti Lather has pointed out

Epistemology · Research methodology · Social science · Sociology · Philosophy · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

  • Getting Smart

    P Lather•Getting Smart•1991

  • Feminism and Methodology

    Sandra G Harding, Sandra Harding•Feminism and methodology•1988

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae