Public–private partnerships in Russia
Dynamics contributing to an emerging policy paradigm
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11193760 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nikolai Mouraviev (0000-0002-7697-4026, KIMEP University, corresponding author), Nada Kakabadse (0000-0002-9517-8279, University of Northampton), Nada K Kakabadse |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 79-96 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-2872 • E-ISSN: 1470-1006 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01442872.2013.875140 |
| OpenAlex | W2141344888 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 19 |
Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are new in Russia and represent project implementation in progress. The government is actively pursuing PPP deployment in sectors such as transportation and urban infrastructure, and at all levels including federal, regional and especially local. Despite the lack of pertinent laws and regulations, the PPP public policy quickly transforms into a policy paradigm that provides simplified concepts and solutions and intensifies partnership development. The article delineates an emerging model of Russia's PPP policy paradigm, whose structure includes the shared understanding of the need for long-term collaboration between the public sector and business, a changing set of government responsibilities that imply an increasing private provision of public services, and new institutional capacities. This article critically appraises the principal dynamics that contribute to an emerging PPP policy paradigm, namely the broad government treatment of the meaning of a partnership and of a contractual PPP; a liberal PPP approval process that lacks clear guidelines and consistency across regions; excessive emphasis on positive PPP externalities and neglect of drawbacks; and unjustifiably extensive government financial support to PPPs. Whilst a paradigm appears to be useful specifically for the policy purpose of PPP expansion, it may also mask inefficiencies such as higher prices of public services and greater government risks
Business · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Externality · General partnership · Government (linguistics · Paradigm shift · Political science · Principal (computer security · Private sector · Public economics · Public policy · Public sector · Public–private partnership · Community Development and Social Impact · Finance · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Public Administration · Public-Private Partnership Projects
Public–private partnership in Public Administration discipline
Turkey’s public–private partnership experience
Why Are State-Business Relations Formalized in Russia’s Authoritarian Regime? A Set-Theoretic Analysis
A refined experimentalist governance approach to incremental policy change
From genplan to master plan
Statebuilding and the Modernisation of Welfare Governance in Russia
Infrastructure Public–Private Partnerships in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar
Public–Private Partnerships
How does public-private collaboration reinvent? A comparative analysis of urban bicycle-sharing policy diffusion in China
Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing
Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public—Private Partnership
Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects
Public—Private Partnerships
The State of the Practice of Value for Money Analysis in Comparing Public Private Partnerships to Traditional Procurements
Public–Private Partnerships
Policy Paradigms, Policy Networks and Water Policy in Israel
Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks
Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State
Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.9 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |