The two‐child limit and fertility decision making
When policy narratives and lived experiences collide
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11197644 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ruth Patrick (0000-0002-3284-6313, Department of Social Policy and Social Work University of York York England), Kate Andersen (0000-0002-8354-4796, Department of Social Policy and Social Work University of York York England, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 580-595 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/spol.12877 |
| OpenAlex | W4310118270 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 19 |
The UK's two‐child limit restricts the child element in Universal Credit and Tax Credits to two children in a household. Given that the policy aims to influence the fertility decision making of parents in (or at risk of) poverty, it is important to explore the impact it has here. This article contrasts the policy rationale for the two‐child limit with everyday realities of fertility decision making. We share new empirical findings from qualitative longitudinal research with parents directly affected by the two‐child limit, contrasting these with the assumptions found in government speeches and statements on the policy. This exploration reveals a series of mismatches, which help explain the relative absence of fertility effects, which has been uncovered in previous quantitative analysis. We show how a government narrative of “choice” over fertility decisions is contradicted by situated realities, where choice is often absent or unresponsive to changes in financial incentives. We also find low levels of awareness of the two‐child limit, militating against it affecting fertility decision making. Our findings demonstrate the importance of better and more sustained engagement with qualitative evidence in the design and review of policies, essential if we are to prevent harms like those witnessed as a result of the two‐child limit
Child poverty · Economic growth · Economics · Fertility · Government (linguistics · Incentive · Microeconomics · Narrative · Political science · Population · Positive economics · Poverty · Public economics · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Austerity as reproductive injustice
Governance by Gaslight
It's the kids that suffer
The Biased Reaction to Changes in Family-Related Public Expenditure
A Tale of Gin and Prostitution’
Challenging welfare mythmaking
Does Cutting Child Benefits Reduce Fertility in Larger Families? Evidence from the UK’s Two-Child Limit
The two-child policy was not associated with an increase in abortions among its target population
Educational trends in cohort fertility by birth order
Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit
Welfare, Inequality and Social Citizenship
Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities
The Professional and Ethical Dilemmas of the Two-child Limit for Child Tax Credit and Universal Credit
Universal Credit
Money matters
Telling stories of 21st century welfare
The alchemy of austerity
Benefits broods’
Do family caps reduce out-of-wedlock births? Evidence from Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, New Jersey and Virginia
Guiding principles for social security policy
Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism
Policy Practitioners' Accounts of Evidence-Based Policy Making
Working on Welfare
Welfare-to-work, Agency and Personal Responsibility
| Citations per year | 4.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |