Response Format Effects in Encounter Norm Questions
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 11217512 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jerry J Vaske (0000-0002-6703-2264, Colorado State University, autor correspondente), Maureen P Donnelly (Colorado State University), Meryem Bihter Bingül, M Bihter BİNGÜL BULUT (0000-0003-4496-8198, Colorado State University) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 284-294 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-05-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Leisure Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0149-0400 • E-ISSN: 1521-0588 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01490400.2015.1092898 |
| OpenAlex | W2333643553 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 47 |
Survey response format has been shown to influence norm prevalence (percentage reporting a norm) and the numerical value of the reported norm. This article summarizes an experiment where respondents were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the semi-open response format treatment, respondents (n = 817) “wrote in a number” for an acceptable number of visitor encounters. In the closed format treatment, individuals (n = 826) “circled a number” of acceptable encounters along a range of possible responses. Hypothesis 1 predicted that norm prevalence would be higher for the closed format than the semi-open. Hypothesis 2 predicted that the mean tolerance level would differ in the two treatments. Results supported hypothesis 1. The percent reporting a norm was statistically higher in the closed versus the semi-open treatment. Results failed to support hypothesis 2. The average tolerance levels for the closed and semi-open formats were statistically equivalent
Norm (philosophy · Visitor pattern · Computer Science · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Current studies in social psychology
Studies in Outdoor Recreation
The Limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning /
Normative Influences on Altruism
A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct
Lessons Learned in Detecting and Correcting Response Heaping
Measuring and Correcting Response Heaping Arising From the Use of Prototypes
Using Normative Data to Develop Evaluative Standards for Resource Management
Situational influences on normative evaluations of coastal tourism and recreation management strategies in Hawai’i
Photograph Presentation Order and Range Effects in Visual-Based Outdoor Recreation Research
Effect of varied question format on boaters’ norms
Who cares about encounters? Differences between those with and without norms
Evaluating Instream Flows for Recreation
Digit preference, recall bias, and nonresponse bias in self reports of angling participation
Generalizing the Encounter--Norm--Crowding Relationship
Norms, standards, and natural resources
Norm accessibility
Response Format Effects in Questions about Norms
Methodological Issues in Measuring Crowding-Related Norms in Outdoor Recreation
Interpersonal versus social‐values conflict
Norm congruence among tour boat passengers to Glacier Bay national park
Toward an Approach for Measuring Indicators of Facility Carrying Capacity in Outdoor Recreation Areas
Systematic Observation of Use Levels, Campsite Selection and Visitor Characteristics at a High Mountain Lake
Use of Visual Research Methods to Measure Standards of Quality for Parks and Outdoor Recreation
River Float Trip Encounter Norms
Types of Norms for Recreation Impacts
User Standards for Ecological Impacts at Wilderness Campsites
Backcountry Encounter Norms
More Visitors, Less Crowding
Differences in Reported Satisfaction Ratings by Consumptive and Nonconsumptive Recreationists
Encounter Norms in Backcountry Settings
Handbook of social psychology
Web Survey Methods
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,13 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2018 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |