Marriage Preparation Education Programs
An Assessment of Their Components
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11221044 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geniel Rowley Childs (Brigham Young University), Stephen Farr Duncan |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 59-81 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Marriage & Family Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-4929 • E-ISSN: 1540-9635 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01494929.2011.626893 |
| OpenAlex | W1973395417 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 29 |
In an effort to evaluate marriage preparation education (MPE) programs against recognized standards of program development, eight MPE programs were examined according to the four components (content, instructional process, implementation process, and evaluation process) of an evaluative model. A team of three researchers rated program components according to a determined set of rubric descriptors and offered qualitative comments associated with program utilization. Results showed that none of the selected programs scored consistently high or low on all program components measured. Most programs had research-supported foundations but were lacking in evaluation information and tools. Qualitative results highlighted strengths and weaknesses among current MPE programs. Recommendations are offered for improving MPE programs and professional standards in the field of MPE
Field (mathematics · Medical education · Pedagogy · Political science · Process (computing · Process management · Program evaluation · Qualitative research · Rubric · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |