The Clinton legacy on ballistic missile defense
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11221480 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark T Clark (California State University, San Bernardino, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 201-219 |
| Publication date | 2000-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495930008403209 |
| OpenAlex | W1994083804 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
The Clinton administration's legacy on missile defense has been to defer to Russian preferences, downplay the threat, and delay deploying missile defenses. Although disagreement between Congress and the executive has led to strategic reevaluation, increased appropriation, and heightened awareness of the scale of the threat, America's security has eroded under current leadership
Administration (probate law · Aeronautics · Appropriation · Ballistic missile · Missile · Missile Defense · National security · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Strategic Defense Initiative · Aerospace Engineering · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Engineering · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|