The future of Clinton's foreign and defense policy
Multilateral security
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11222604 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark T Clark (California State University, San Bernardino, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 181-195 |
| Publication date | 1994-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495939408402972 |
| OpenAlex | W2049591631 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 9 |
The Clinton administration does not have a clear foreign and defense policy. Budget reductions in the Department of Defense, largely a function of domestic economics, are increasing the disparity between the ends and means of U.S. foreign and security policies. As a result, the Clinton administration will seek multilateral security efforts as a means to redress the imbalance
Administration (probate law · Business · Computer security · Economics · Foreign policy · Function (biology · International trade · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Redress · Security policy · Computer Science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.13 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1995 - 2000 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |