Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The absence of evidence of the effectiveness of Australian gender equity in STEM initiatives

Bibliographic Data

ID11228604
AuthorsMeghan Mckinnon (0000-0003-4808-0380, Centre for the Public Awareness of Science Australian National University Canberra Australia, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume57
Issue1
Pages202-214
Publication date2022-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajs4.142
OpenAlexW3099280614
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited15

This paper explores the range of initiatives offered across Australia to support the attraction, retention and progression of girls and women to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) studies and careers. A mapping exercise, conducted by the author as part of the development of the Decadal Plan for Women in STEM for the Australian Academy of Science, provided an overview of 337 programmes and initiatives offered nationally, the majority of which were university scholarships. Academia, industry and government are the main providers of these initiatives, with collaborations common between all the different stakeholder groups identified. Of all the initiatives mapped, only seven had publicly facing evaluation data, of which one went beyond self‐reports of satisfaction and enjoyment. The myriad initiatives show a concerted effort to engage girls and women in STEM, but the absence of any meaningful evidence of impact means we simply do not know whether these initiatives are benefiting girls and women and achieving the desired policy outcomes or not

Equity (law · Gender equity · Government (linguistics · Political science · Project commissioning · Public relations · Publishing · Social science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Women in science · Education Systems and Policy · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Studies

  • Genomic surveillance and indigenous sovereignty

    Open Access•Pragnesh Parmar, Gunvanti Rathod•SN Social Sciences•2026

  • A Systematic Map of Inclusion, Equity and Diversity in Science Communication Research

    Open Access•Karina Judd, Meghan Mckinnon et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2021

  • Looking Back to Look Forward

    Open Access•James Deehan•Education Sciences•2026

  • Digital transformation and gender justice

    Rosa Monteiro, Ernesto Nieto-Carrillo et al.•Journal of Information…•2026

  • Creative Self-Efficacy

    Open Access•Maria Vieira, JohnPaul Kennedy et al.•Creativity Research Journal•2025

  • Invisible women

    Open Access•Kathryn Ross, S Galaudage et al.•Australian Journal of Education•2023

  • Women in Engineering at a Regional Public University

    Open Access•Jessica Janina Cabezas-Quinto, Lenin Ernesto Chagerben Salinas et al.•Societies•2025

  • International graduates on temporary post‐graduation visas in Australia

    Open Access•Ly Thi Tran, George Tan et al.•Population Space and Place•2022

  • The Effect of Robotics and Coding Education on Girls’ STEM Motivation, Attitude and Career Aspirations

    Open Access•Salih Gülen, İsmail Dönmez et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Increasing diversity in STEM academia

    Open Access•Johanna Meyer, Julie Barnett et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2025

  • STEMinist sensibilities in the promotion of STEM and tech participation to women and girls

    Open Access•Angela Bennette, Kim Toffoletti•Journal of Gender Studies•2024

  • The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

    Open Access•Gijsbert Stoet, David C Geary•Psychological Science•2018

  • The replication problem and its implications for policy studies

    Kevin Morrell, Jeffrey W Lucas•Critical Policy Studies•2012

  • Three Lenses of Evidence‐Based Policy

    Open Access•Bessie Head•Australian Journal of Public…•2008

  • Measuring Policy Success

    Open Access•Joshua Newman•Australian Journal of Public…•2014

  • Feminism, Gender, and Power Relations in Policy – Starting a New Conversation

    Open Access•George Carey, Helen Dickinson et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2018

  • Evidence Based Policy

    Open Access•George Argyrous•Australian Journal of Public…•2012

  • Feminising Politics to Close the Evidence‐Policy Gap

    Open Access•Paul Cairney, Kirstein Rummery•Australian Journal of Public…•2018

  • Usable Knowledge in Public Policy

    Open Access•David Adams, David M Adams•Australian Journal of Public…•2004

  • Measuring gender in R&I – theories, methods, and experience

    Open Access•Rachel Palmén, Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt et al.•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2019

  • Neoliberalism and gender equality policy in Australia

    Susan Harris Rimmer, Marian Sawer•Australian Journal of Political…•2016

  • Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies

    Open Access•A Kalev, Frank Dobbins et al.•American Sociological Review•2006

  • University-led STEM outreach programs

    K Sadler, E Eilam et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2018

  • STEM intervention programs

    Blanca E Rincon, Casey E George-Jackson et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2016

Citations per year2.2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae