Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring gender in R&I – theories, methods, and experience

Bibliographic Data

ID11935928
AuthorsRachel Palmén (0000-0003-3038-2807, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya), Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt (0000-0002-3204-0803, Aarhus University), Clemens Striebing (0000-0003-1410-3716, Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering, Stuttgart, Germany, corresponding author), Sybille Reidl (0000-0001-6453-5926, Joanneum Research, Vienna, Austria), Susanne Bührer (0000-0002-1923-1437, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany), Dóra Groó (The Association of Hungarian Women in Science (NATE), Budapest, Hungary)
Year2019
Volume44
Issue2
Pages154-165
Publication date2019-05-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Science Reviews (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-0188 • E-ISSN: 1743-2790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03080188.2019.1603873
OpenAlexW2947808335
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited11

This article provides an overview of the theoretical assumptions, methods, and key results from the Evaluation Framework for Promoting Gender Equality in Research and Innovation (EFFORTI) project, which was funded by the European Commission. The purpose of EFFORTI was to analyse the impact of interventions to promote gender equality in research and innovation (R&I), and to establish criteria for more responsible and responsive research and innovation (RRI) systems in Europe. This article provides an overview of the project's main results and the lessons learnt from the empirical analysis of R&I systems in several European countries and a comparison of 19 gender equality intervention measures

Epistemology · Sociology · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Innovation Policy and RD · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Network assessment

    Open Access•Anastasia Zabaniotou, Oumaïma Boukamel et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2021

  • The Complexity of Defining Institutional Change in Academia

    Open Access•Fernanda Campanini Vilhena, María López Belloso et al.•Social Inclusion•2025

  • The absence of evidence of the effectiveness of Australian gender equity in STEM initiatives

    Open Access•Meghan Mckinnon•Australian Journal of Social Issues•2022

  • Evidence-Based Policy

    Nancy Cartwright, Jeremy Hardie•Evidence-based policy•2012

  • A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009

    Open Access•Chris L S Coryn, Lindsay A Noakes et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2011

  • Using theories of change in the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health

    Open Access•John Mayne, Nancy L Johnson et al.•Evaluation•2015

  • Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation

    Open Access•Avril Blamey, Margaret Mackenzie•Evaluation•2007

  • An examination of evaluation users’ preferences for program- and actor-oriented theories of change

    Open Access•Yuval Ofek•Evaluation•2017

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae