Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

National assessment and the future of art education

Bibliographic Data

ID11261017
AuthorsBrent Wilson (0000-0002-7415-9773, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author)
Year1975
Volume52
Issue3
Pages213-216
Publication date1975-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePeabody Journal of Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0161-956X • E-ISSN: 1532-7930
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01619567509538017
OpenAlexW2070423484
LanguageEN

Throughout the 1974-75 school year, teams of National Assessment administrators have been working on a scientifically selected, stratified random sample of schools throughout the country. Their purpose is to ask nine-, thirteen-, and seventeen-year-old students to respond to carefully formulated exercises indicating how well they: (1) perceive and respond to various aspects of works of art, (2) value art as an important realm of human experience, (3) produce works of art, (4) have acquired knowledge about art, and (5) make and justify judgments about the aesthetic merit and quality of works of art. There are actually 153 major and subobjectives being evaluated by the assessment.' These objectives, formulated by teams of art educators and others working in the arts, reflect the major purposes of art education throughout the country. The National Assessment in art is designed to gather, analyze, and report data which will furnish information regarding the achievements of children and youth. The data are being collected from a stratified sample so that findings may be reported for four major geographical regions of the country, by community size and type, by socio-economic levels, by sex and race, and (perhaps most important for art education) by the nature and amount of art instruction received in schools. As the major outcome, the assessment in art will produce information relating schooling to art achievement. However, the implications of National Assessment and its possible influence on the evaluation of art teaching and research in art education range far broader than mere findings of the current assessment. These influences may best be explored through discussion of a series of questions about work already accomplished and future assessment developments. What has already been accomplished by the National Assessment in art? Objectives: The National Assessment objectives represent a comprehensive synthesis of desired art educational outcomes. These objectives have served as the basis upon which other sets of objectives have been extended and refined. The Florida objectives represent one of the finest examples.2 The National Assessment objectives can serve also as the basis for competency-based statements for public schools and for teacher training programs

Art · Fine art · Pedagogy · Political science · Public relations · Realm · Sample (material · Sociology · Stratified sampling · The arts · Value (mathematics · Visual arts · Visual arts education · Art Education and Development · Computer Science · Digital Media and Visual Art · Diverse Music Education Insights · Medicine · Psychology

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae